Author
Listed:
- Sk. Reza-E-Rabbi
(Civil and Infrastructure Engineering Department, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne 3001, Australia)
- Shanuka Dodampegama
(Civil and Infrastructure Engineering Department, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne 3001, Australia)
- Muhammed A. Bhuiyan
(Civil and Infrastructure Engineering Department, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne 3001, Australia)
- Guomin (Kevin) Zhang
(Civil and Infrastructure Engineering Department, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Centre for Future Construction, RMIT University, Melbourne 3001, Australia)
- Kanishka Atapattu
(Civil and Infrastructure Engineering Department, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne 3001, Australia)
Abstract
Residential building retrofit requires reliable building energy simulation and efficient performance prediction. This research presents an adaptable workflow for establishing two residential base model templates, namely corner space (CS) and intermediate space (IS). The models were assessed through National Construction Code of Australia-based verification, comparison with a documented Melbourne residential reference model, and Morris index convergence analysis. These models were coupled with an AI-assisted three-stage prediction framework and evaluated across seven additional Australian climates, with Melbourne as the primary case, to examine cross-climate applicability. Stage 1 developed a two-variable analytical model to predict annual energy consumption. Stage 2 extended this to a three-variable relation and compared its energy predictions with support vector machine (SVM). Stage 3 examined multivariable cases using four machine learning (ML) models—artificial neural network (ANN), SVM, random forest (RF), and decision tree (DT)—to predict performance metrics and identify the best model. For the primary Melbourne case, the two-variable relation reproduced the simulated response with mean absolute percentage errors (MAPEs) of 0.27% and 0.62% for CS and IS, respectively. In Stage 2, the analytical model achieved a MAPE of 8.38%, while SVM reduced the error to 0.75%. Cross-climate results confirmed that the staged workflow remained robust across different climates. In Stage 3, SVM was robust with limited data, while the ANN and RF became more competitive with larger samples. DT was prone to overfitting. The proposed framework supports early-stage residential retrofit assessment by enabling retrofit hotspot screening and suitable surrogate model selection before detailed optimization.
Suggested Citation
Sk. Reza-E-Rabbi & Shanuka Dodampegama & Muhammed A. Bhuiyan & Guomin (Kevin) Zhang & Kanishka Atapattu, 2026.
"Climate-Sensitive Staged Predictive Framework for Sustainable Residential Retrofit Assessment Using Adaptable Base Model Templates,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-31, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:14:p:7230-:d:1991630
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:14:p:7230-:d:1991630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.