IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i14p7178-d1990665.html

Integrated Sustainability Assessment of Morocco’s Renewable Energy Transition: Comparative Analysis of Solar, Wind, and Hydropower Development

Author

Listed:
  • Chaimaa Errifai

    (Geo-Resources and Environment Laboratory, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30000, Morocco)

  • Majid Atmani

    (Geo-Resources and Environment Laboratory, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30000, Morocco)

  • Asmae Benabderrahmane

    (Geo-Resources and Environment Laboratory, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30000, Morocco)

Abstract

Morocco has emerged as a prominent renewable energy leader in North Africa and a significant contributor to the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region through the extensive implementation of solar, wind, and hydropower technologies, supported by a sophisticated legal framework established since 2010. This study presents an integrated sustainability assessment of Morocco’s renewable energy transition through a structured comparative analysis of these three technologies across technical, economic, environmental, and socioeconomic dimensions. The methodology is built on a structured literature search and screening process covering 71 peer-reviewed articles and institutional reports published between 2010 and 2025. In order to facilitate the comparative sustainability assessment, sources were identified through Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and institutional repositories such as MASEN, IRENA, IEA, and the World Bank. Each technology was relatively evaluated using six sustainability criteria: energy security contribution, economic competitiveness, environmental sustainability, grid stability contribution, scalability potential, and socioeconomic impact. The assessment utilized quantitative indicators extracted from institutional databases and peer-reviewed literature with a standardized scoring framework and sensitivity analysis to determine the robustness of the technology rankings under alternative policy-priority scenarios. Technologies were comparatively scored on a standardized 1–5 scale based on quantitative proxies including installed capacity (MW), levelized cost of energy (USD/MWh), capacity factor (%), CO 2 avoided (tCO 2 /GWh), jobs per MW, and dispatchability characteristics. A sensitivity analysis using five alternative weighting scenarios representing different policy priorities confirmed the robustness and consistency of the technology rankings. The comparative assessment indicates that solar energy achieved the highest scalability score (5/5), wind energy achieved the highest economic competitiveness score (5/5), and hydropower achieved the highest grid stability score (5/5) , owing to its dispatchability and pumped-storage capability. The findings confirm that Morocco’s transition rests on technological complementarity rather than dominance by a single source. Structural challenges persist, including intermittency, storage insufficiency, grid modernization requirements, external financing dependency, and territorial disparities in socioeconomic benefits. The study proposes a replicable comparative sustainability assessment framework that can support renewable energy planning and policy decisions in Morocco and other emerging economies pursuing large-scale energy transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaimaa Errifai & Majid Atmani & Asmae Benabderrahmane, 2026. "Integrated Sustainability Assessment of Morocco’s Renewable Energy Transition: Comparative Analysis of Solar, Wind, and Hydropower Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-32, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:14:p:7178-:d:1990665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/14/7178/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/14/7178/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:14:p:7178-:d:1990665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.