Author
Listed:
- Flavio Ñanco
(Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Chile)
- Jorge Jiménez
(Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Chile)
- Karina Crisóstomo
(Laboratorio de Química de Productos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Chile)
- Jorge Acuña
(Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Temuco 4781144, Chile)
- Lisdelys González-Rodríguez
(Centro de Modelación Ambiental y Dinámica de Sistemas (CEMADIS), Universidad de Las Américas, Santiago 7500000, Chile
Facultad de Ingeniería y Negocios, Universidad de Las Américas, Sede Concepción, Concepción 4030000, Chile)
- Oscar Farias
(Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Chile)
- Víctor Hernández
(Laboratorio de Química de Productos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Chile)
- José Becerra
(Laboratorio de Química de Productos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Chile)
Abstract
Residential heater replacement programs in Chile have been evaluated primarily through fine particulate matter (PM) reduction metrics, without considering chemical speciation of the organic aerosols. This screening-level study characterized and compared particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and nitro-PAH emission factors from a residential firewood and a wood pellet heater, under controlled combustion conditions, and assessed their potential toxic equivalency (BaP-TEQ). Compound quantification used 1-nitropyrene as an index calibration compound; all results are semi-quantitative estimates with a combined analytical uncertainty of approximately 13–32%. Firewood combustion yielded a PAH-dominated emission profile with a total BaP-TEQ EF of 187.8 ng/kg, driven primarily by benzo[a]pyrene (BaP; individual contribution: 183.9 ng/kg). Wood pellet combustion showed a nitro-PAH-dominated profile under the applied semi-quantitative analytical conditions, with concentrations expressed as 1-nitropyrene-equivalent estimates and several compounds identified tentatively by NIST library matching, yielding a total screening-level BaP-TEQ EF of 972.1 ng/kg, approximately five-fold higher than firewood under the applied TEF framework and driven primarily by 6-nitrochrysene (toxic equivalency factor, TEF = 10). This screening-level estimate should not be interpreted as a direct human health risk between the two heating systems. Mean PM emission factors were 1.05 ± 0.55 g/kg for firewood combustion and 0.69 ± 0.15 g/kg for pellet combustion (approximately 1.5-fold difference). These results are reported descriptively given the screening-level nature of the analysis. The shift in particulate chemical profile from PAH-dominated in the firewood system to nitro-PAH-dominated in the pellet system suggests that wood pellets from pine may not be a sustainable approach to address air quality problems in Chile, since reductions in PM emissions alone may not capture relevant differences in the organic toxicological profile between these combustion systems. These findings provide a regional baseline for the chemical speciation of residential biomass emissions in Chile.
Suggested Citation
Flavio Ñanco & Jorge Jiménez & Karina Crisóstomo & Jorge Acuña & Lisdelys González-Rodríguez & Oscar Farias & Víctor Hernández & José Becerra, 2026.
"Screening-Level Emission Factors and Semi-Quantitative Toxic Equivalency of Polycyclic and Nitro-Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Residential Biomass Combustion in Chile,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-30, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:14:p:7143-:d:1989782
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:14:p:7143-:d:1989782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.