IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i14p7054-d1987797.html

Sustainable Assessment of Vetiver-Based Nature-Based Solutions for Landslide Hazard Mitigation Under Groundwater, Surcharge, and Pseudo-Static Seismic Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Jose Luis Chavez-Torres

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Loja, Loja 1101608, Ecuador
    College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China
    Research Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China)

  • Kunyong Zhang

    (College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China
    Research Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China
    Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China)

  • Jhon Patricio Rodríguez-Tapia

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Loja, Loja 1101608, Ecuador
    College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China
    Research Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China)

  • Alejandra Nathaly Flores-Granda

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Loja, Loja 1101608, Ecuador
    College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China
    Research Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China)

Abstract

Sustainable landslide hazard mitigation requires scenario-based assessment of nature-based solutions under realistic hydromechanical and multi-hazard conditions. This study evaluates the mechanical effect of Vetiver grass ( Chrysopogon zizanioides ) on slope stability in Loja, southern Ecuador, through an integrated framework combining geotechnical characterization, direct shear testing, finite element modelling, limit equilibrium analysis, and targeted statistical evaluation. Three fine-grained soils, classified as CH, MH, and ML, were analysed under baseline groundwater conditions, groundwater with an 8 kN/m 2 surcharge, and groundwater with surcharge plus pseudo-static seismic loading. Vetiver reinforcement increased apparent cohesion by 8.92–27.65% and internal friction angle by 6.90–17.43%, with the highest cohesion gain in ML soil. Numerical results showed that stabilization was controlled by soil type, slope geometry, loading condition, and interaction between the 2.0 m root-reinforced layer and the governing failure mechanism. Under surcharge loading, FS for ML at 0.5H:1V increased from 1.056 to 1.450. Under combined loading, FS increased from 0.217 to 1.440 for ML at 1H:1V and from 0.587 to 2.060 for CH at 1H:1V. Targeted ANOVA/MANOVA for MH soil confirmed the influence of geometry and combined loading. Therefore, Vetiver should be considered a complementary, site-specific, and risk-informed mitigation measure rather than a universal stabilization solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose Luis Chavez-Torres & Kunyong Zhang & Jhon Patricio Rodríguez-Tapia & Alejandra Nathaly Flores-Granda, 2026. "Sustainable Assessment of Vetiver-Based Nature-Based Solutions for Landslide Hazard Mitigation Under Groundwater, Surcharge, and Pseudo-Static Seismic Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-26, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:14:p:7054-:d:1987797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/14/7054/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/14/7054/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:14:p:7054-:d:1987797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.