Author
Listed:
- Xiaoxu Wang
(School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China)
- Peng Yin
(School of Business, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China)
Abstract
The 15-minute life circle has become a critical planning paradigm for developing age-friendly cities; however, its implementation in small and medium-sized cities (SMSCs) is often constrained by topographical heterogeneity and the oversimplified use of facility density as a proxy for service efficiency. This study challenges the conventional assumption that a higher facility density automatically leads to better service outcomes and proposes a dynamic “space–demand–policy” analytical framework to identify the mechanisms underlying spatial mismatch. Using Zhifu District, Yantai, a rapidly aging urban area with complex topography, as a case study, we integrated kernel density estimation (KDE), slope-adjusted network analysis, a modified Gaussian-based two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method, and standard deviational ellipse (SDE) analysis. Our results reveal three key findings. First, a “high-density, low-efficiency” paradox is prevalent: older urban cores contain clusters of facilities but have supply–demand ratios below 0.5 because of limited service diversity and slope-induced reductions in accessibility, with the effective service radius decreasing to 750 m. Second, newly developed areas achieve service coverage rates below 50% when terrain constraints are considered, highlighting the limitations of static planning radii. Third, a 90% overlap between the directional distributions of residential areas and elderly care facilities, as indicated by their SDE major axes, supports the spatial feasibility of community-embedded aging-in-place models; however, physical proximity alone does not guarantee effective service delivery. By adapting generic spatial algorithms to create a terrain-sensitive planning tool, this study provides a transferable framework for evidence-based and targeted elderly care planning in SMSCs facing similar demographic and geographic constraints. The proposed framework contributes to the global sustainability agenda and advances SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) and SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) by promoting more equitable resource allocation and supporting the development of age-friendly, walkable, and sustainable communities in topographically complex urban areas.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:14:p:6962-:d:1986186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.