Author
Listed:
- Yan He
(School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
- Li Zhu
(School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
- Haoyu Deng
(School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
- Ni Zhang
(School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
- Quhan Chen
(School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
- Siyu Zhang
(School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
- Xiangxiang Chen
(School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
- Chenxi Song
(School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
Abstract
Although streateries, defined here as outdoor commercial extensions of dining, café, or retail activities into street-edge pedestrian spaces, can enliven urban streets, their commercial use of public pedestrian space may raise concerns about openness, shareability, and inclusion. This study examines how different streatery interface designs affect pedestrians’ perceived spatial publicness and emotional restoration, and whether perceived spatial publicness mediates this relationship. Drawing on publicness studies and Restorative Environment Theory, a scenario-based between-subjects experiment was conducted using four standardized visual stimuli: boundaryless open, fully enclosed, flexible permeable, and hybrid covered interfaces. Based on 420 valid questionnaires, Welch’s ANOVA, Games–Howell post hoc tests, independent-sample t -tests, and PROCESS mediation analysis were performed. The results show that prior streatery consumption experience significantly increased perceived spatial publicness but did not significantly affect emotional restoration. Interface type had significant effects on both outcomes, following a non-monotonic pattern: hybrid covered and flexible permeable interfaces performed best, the fully enclosed interface performed worst, and the boundaryless open interface was not necessarily optimal. Perceived spatial publicness partially mediated the relationship between interface type and emotional restoration, indicating one psychological pathway through which interface design shapes restorative experience. These findings suggest a possible perceptual-level emotional compensation pathway, in which perceived spatial publicness serves as one tested route linking streatery interface design with emotional restoration in southern Chinese commercial street contexts. The study offers context-specific evidence for public-experience-oriented streatery design in southern Chinese commercial streets.
Suggested Citation
Yan He & Li Zhu & Haoyu Deng & Ni Zhang & Quhan Chen & Siyu Zhang & Xiangxiang Chen & Chenxi Song, 2026.
"Streatery Interface Design for Healthy and Inclusive Streets: A Scenario-Based Experimental Study of Perceived Spatial Publicness and Emotional Restoration,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-25, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6927-:d:1985693
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6927-:d:1985693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.