Author
Listed:
- Ziqi Zhang
(Jing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China)
- Fuhai An
(Jing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
Chinese Education Modernization Research Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China)
Abstract
Sustainable educational equity, the principle behind United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 4, calls for ensuring that disadvantaged students benefit from emerging educational technologies rather than being pushed further behind. As AI learning tools become routine in secondary schools, whether they reduce or widen socioeconomic gaps in learning has become a pressing question for sustainable educational policy. Building on digital divide theory and the resource substitution hypothesis, we tested whether family socioeconomic status (SES) moderates the link between students’ AI use quality and deep learning approach—specifically, whether high-quality AI use is more strongly associated with deep learning approach for students from lower-SES backgrounds. Data came from 548 students at three public high schools in Hangzhou, China. AI use quality was operationalized as a three-part construct (seeking, evaluating, applying). Deep learning approach was measured with the deep approach subscale of the R-SPQ-2F. We tested moderation with hierarchical regression and probed the interaction with simple slopes. Two results stood out. First, both SES and AI use quality positively predicted deep learning approach. Family SES moderated the association between AI use quality and deep learning approach: the link between AI use quality and deep learning approach was stronger for low-SES students than for their higher-SES peers, and when AI use quality was high, the deep learning gap across SES levels was correspondingly narrower. The data support the equalizer hypothesis: high-quality AI use can narrow the SES-related gap in deep learning approach and serve as a lever for sustainable educational equity. Schools that want AI to advance equity should treat AI literacy as an instructional priority across subjects, not as something students are expected to figure out on their own.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6925-:d:1985678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.