Author
Listed:
- Iman Seyedi
(Department of Computer Science Systems and Communication, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy)
- Antonio Candelieri
(Department of Economics Management and Statistics, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy)
- Francesco Archetti
(Department of Computer Science Systems and Communication, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy)
Abstract
Designing sustainable closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) networks requires jointly assessing node-level operational attributes (recovery efficiency, processing capacity, unit cost) and inter-node spatial structure. Existing methods, including mixed-integer programming, multi-objective metaheuristics, and graph-matching, typically optimize a single cost dimension and do not decompose structural connectivity from attribute-level inefficiency. We propose a Fused Gromov–Wasserstein (FGW) diagnostic framework that combines the Wasserstein distance (attribute similarity) and the Gromov–Wasserstein distance (structural alignment) via a convex trade-off parameter α, solved using the conditional gradient algorithm. Supply–capacity imbalances are resolved by marginal rescaling, with residual unabsorbed mass reported as a diagnostic indicator of infrastructure shortfall. The framework is applied to an eight-echelon PET bottle recovery and filament manufacturing network across 24 synthetic benchmark instances at three scale classes. The FGW cost decomposes exactly into feature and structural components, allowing bottleneck arcs to be diagnosed as attribute-driven or structure-driven. Under this benchmark, bottleneck cost decreases with network size, the most frequent bottleneck arc shifts from the collection interface in small networks to the mid-chain processing handoff in large networks, and attribute heterogeneity accounts for the majority of FGW cost (57.9%, conditional on the normalization and weighting scheme used) across all 144 arc–instance combinations. These results position FGW as a tractable, interpretable diagnostic layer for circular supply chain analysis, complementing rather than replacing classical CLSC design models.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6906-:d:1985336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.