IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6896-d1985197.html

Sustainable Management of Buffalo Manure Digestate: Environmental and Economic Assessment of Biochar-Based Cover for Ammonia Emission Mitigation

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Mautone

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Ester Scotto di Perta

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy)

  • Raffaele Grieco

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
    Department of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark)

  • Elena Cervelli

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy)

  • Stefania Pindozzi

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy)

Abstract

Storage of livestock effluents represents a major source of ammonia (NH 3 ) emissions into the atmosphere. Reducing ammonia volatilisation is essential to improve the efficiency of nutrient use, mitigate air pollution, and enhance the overall sustainability of livestock production systems aligned with the principles of the circular economy. Therefore, identifying efficient and sustainable mitigation strategies is crucial. Conventional floating covers are commonly used to reduce emissions; however, they present limitations in terms of management, durability, and cost. This study proposes a novel approach by comparing traditional floating cover materials like straw and light expanded clay with biochar as an innovative and sustainable mitigation strategy to reduce ammonia volatilisation from the liquid fraction of buffalo digestate obtained from an anaerobic digestion plant in southern Italy. All cover materials were applied at a uniform thickness of 2 cm under laboratory conditions using a dynamic chamber technique. Additionally, a cost analysis was performed considering the material purchase cost for an average storage tank of 700 m 2 and two hypothetical reduction efficiencies (50% and 70%). Results indicated that biochar was the most effective cover, achieving a 67% reduction in ammonia emissions compared with the uncovered control. Light expanded clay exhibited the lowest efficiency, likely due to its insufficient sealing capacity at the applied thickness. From an economic perspective, biochar becomes increasingly competitive when emission reduction efficiency is accounted for, owing to its favourable physical–chemical properties. The results highlight the potential of using biochar as a sustainable, circular strategy for mitigating atmospheric emissions and improving nitrogen conservation, while also creating opportunities for its subsequent reuse in agriculture as a soil amendment.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Mautone & Ester Scotto di Perta & Raffaele Grieco & Elena Cervelli & Stefania Pindozzi, 2026. "Sustainable Management of Buffalo Manure Digestate: Environmental and Economic Assessment of Biochar-Based Cover for Ammonia Emission Mitigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6896-:d:1985197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6896/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6896/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6896-:d:1985197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.