Author
Listed:
- Bin Yang
(The School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210000, China)
- Yongbiao Yang
(The School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)
- Qingshan Xu
(The School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)
Abstract
Power-quality resilience is an important component of sustainable industrial electricity use, as voltage sag events can cause production interruptions, equipment damage, and inefficient allocation of mitigation costs and benefits among stakeholders. However, high initial investment costs and the lack of a viable commercial operation scheme have hindered the large-scale deployment of mitigation devices. To support sustainable power-quality governance, this study proposes an integrated framework that connects the technical compensation performance of the mitigation device with the economic foundation of a tripartite commercial operation model. First, an adaptive switching compensation strategy dynamically shifts between different modes based on the real-time voltage sag depth, establishing a mapping relationship with avoided-loss benefits. Then, a bi-level Nash bargaining model is constructed to allocate costs and benefits among the government, the enterprise, and the user, deriving closed-form analytical solutions for both the upper- and lower-level games. Through pilot operations at a large public service facility, economic losses of 480,000 CNY caused by a single voltage sag can be effectively avoided. Meanwhile, under the proposed scheme, all three parties achieve positive net present values. Compared to the user self-funding mode, the user’s NPV increases by 21.9%. Furthermore, unlike bilateral or equal-sharing alternatives, the Nash bargaining solution ensures all parties remain within the strong feasible region. The government and enterprise recover their costs within 4.14 and 6.20 years, respectively. These results indicate that the proposed framework can enhance the economic sustainability of power-sensitive users, encourage shared public–private investment in power-quality improvement, and support more resilient and efficient industrial electricity use.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6878-:d:1984718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.