IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6873-d1984611.html

A Systematic Literature Review on Bipolar Fuzzy Soft Sets in Environmental Sustainability and the Conceptual Development of Weighted BFSS

Author

Listed:
  • Ema Carnia

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Sukono

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Dwi Susanti

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Mohd Zaki Awang Chek

    (Center for Actuarial Studies, Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Tapah Campus, Tapah Road, Tapah 35400, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Mugi Lestari

    (Master’s Program in Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Audrey Ariij Sya’imaa HS

    (Master’s Program in Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Moch Panji Agung Saputra

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, West Java, Indonesia)

Abstract

Effective environmental sustainability decision-making requires the consideration of both positive and negative information, as well as the integration of weighting methods, to ensure decisions are accurate and representative of real-world conditions. This study presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) on the development of the Weighted Bipolar Fuzzy Soft Set (WBFSS) framework for environmental sustainability decision-making. Articles were retrieved from three databases: Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Dimensions. The screening process adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and identified 27 relevant articles. VOSviewer was subsequently used to conduct a bibliometric analysis, mapping keyword co-occurrences and the structural landscape of research topics. The analysis examined the evolution of Bipolar Fuzzy Soft Set (BFSS) frameworks, their application domains, and the integration of weighting methods within BFSS and related Fuzzy Soft Set (FSS) frameworks. The review found that, although 11 studies addressed environmental sustainability applications, only three explicitly employed BFSS-based frameworks, indicating that the application of BFSS in this domain remains limited. Furthermore, the incorporation of explicit weighting techniques within BFSS remains scarce, particularly for objective, data-driven weighting approaches. These findings provide a comprehensive overview of current research trends, identify important methodological gaps, and support the conceptual development of the WBFSS framework as a direction for future research rather than an established decision-making framework. This study highlights opportunities to advance decision-support methods for environmental sustainability, which may support future climate-related and sustainability-oriented decision-making in the context of Sustainable Development Goal 13 (Climate Action).

Suggested Citation

  • Ema Carnia & Sukono & Dwi Susanti & Mohd Zaki Awang Chek & Mugi Lestari & Audrey Ariij Sya’imaa HS & Moch Panji Agung Saputra, 2026. "A Systematic Literature Review on Bipolar Fuzzy Soft Sets in Environmental Sustainability and the Conceptual Development of Weighted BFSS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-32, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6873-:d:1984611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6873/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6873/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6873-:d:1984611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.