Author
Listed:
- Şemsettin Çiğdem
(Department of International Trade and Logistics, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep 27310, Türkiye)
- Bülent Yıldız
(Department of Business Administration, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu 37210, Türkiye)
- Semih Kaya
(Institute of Social Sciences, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu 37210, Türkiye)
- Dilber Nilay Kütahyalı
(Kastamonu Vocational School, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu 37210, Türkiye)
Abstract
Even though hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are essential for decarbonization, getting consumers to accept them remains a tough issue. This research combines normative and cognitive theories to find out if environmental values actually take precedence over logical risk assessments. We analyzed data from 761 consumers in Türkiye, using the structural equation model and Hayes’ PROCESS Macro. The results show that, although environmental concerns strongly increased awareness (β = 0.80) and awareness lowered perceived risk (β = −0.34), perceived risk itself did not significantly predict purchase intention (β = 0.03, p > 0.05). Instead, decisions were motivated by a hope-based path: Concern → Awareness → Usefulness → Intention. We tentatively interpret this as Green Motivation Dominance, whereby environmentally motivated early adopters appear to prioritize environmental benefits over technical hazards; notably, perceived usefulness significantly predicted intention (β = 0.29), and the serial path Concern → Awareness → Usefulness → Intention was significant (effect = 0.25, 95% CI [0.17, 0.35]). This interpretation, however, warrants direct testing in future research. Thus, the main factor driving adoption is the presence of advantages, not the absence of risk. Therefore, policymakers should focus on maximizing benefits rather than just trying to reduce risks.
Suggested Citation
Şemsettin Çiğdem & Bülent Yıldız & Semih Kaya & Dilber Nilay Kütahyalı, 2026.
"Bridging Awareness and Intention in Sustainable Mobility: A Value–Belief–Norm-Informed Technology Acceptance Analysis of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle Purchase Intention,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-26, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6864-:d:1984454
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6864-:d:1984454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.