Author
Listed:
- Edison Ramirez-Olivares
(Departamento de Ingeniería de Minas, Universidad de La Serena, La Serena 1720170, Chile)
- Alberto Cortes-Álvarez
(Departamento de Ingeniería de Minas, Universidad de La Serena, La Serena 1720170, Chile)
- Juan Alfaro Robles
(Departamento de Ingeniería de Minas, Universidad de La Serena, La Serena 1720170, Chile)
Abstract
Lithium has become a critical resource in the global energy transition; however, its sustainability assessment remains fragmented, as technological performance, environmental impacts, and governance dimensions are typically evaluated independently. This fragmentation constrains the understanding of systemic trade-offs and limits the recognition of sustainability as an emergent property arising from the interaction of technological, hydrogeological, and territorial configurations. This study proposes a systemic approach that conceptualizes lithium extraction technologies as interdependent configurations rather than isolated technical solutions. Based on a structured review of scientific literature and operational evidence, the analysis integrates resource efficiency, technological performance, environmental impacts, and governance dimensions to identify patterns of impact redistribution across water consumption, energy use, production efficiency, and hydrogeological stability. The findings indicate that Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) should not be interpreted as a universally superior alternative but rather as a reconfiguration of the extraction system that reduces brine withdrawal while increasing dependence on freshwater resources, energy consumption, and uncertainties associated with reinjection processes. Furthermore, evidence from Chile demonstrates that favorable geological conditions do not necessarily translate into sustainability outcomes because of persistent water constraints and socio-environmental tensions. Overall, the sustainability of lithium extraction depends less on the characteristics of individual technologies than on the degree of alignment between technological configuration, hydrogeological conditions, and governance arrangements. These findings shift the focus of assessment from linear comparisons among technologies toward a systemic evaluation of configurations that is better suited to contexts characterized by high socio-hydrogeological complexity.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6860-:d:1984402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.