IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6853-d1984301.html

Improving Road and Vehicle Safety Through Administrative Register Data: Sustainable Road Safety Analytics for Romania (2023–2025) via Dual Severity and Context Clustering

Author

Listed:
  • Dorin Tataru

    (Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Transport Engineering (IMIT), University of Petroșani, 20 Universității Street, Hunedoara County, 332006 Petroșani, Romania)

  • Artur Budzyński

    (Department of Transport Systems, Traffic Engineering and Logistics, Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 8 Krasińskiego Street, 40-019 Katowice, Poland)

  • Andreea Cristina Tataru

    (Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Transport Engineering (IMIT), University of Petroșani, 20 Universității Street, Hunedoara County, 332006 Petroșani, Romania)

Abstract

Road traffic injuries remain a central challenge for sustainable transport, public health, and mobility governance. The task of monitoring these injuries requires indicators that jointly capture harm severity, road and environmental context, and patterns of vehicle involvement at scale. Using harmonised English-language Romanian police crash exports (2023–2025), we build 92,790 records with 36 variables and estimate two complementary k -means typologies: a severity partition based on the fatality, injury, and vehicle-count fields (a register proxy for involvement, not vehicle-type attributes) and a context partition based on the road, environment, mechanism, and cause fields with one-hot encoding and TruncatedSVD. Reported tables and figures reproduce the archived MiniBatch pipeline for replication; for context, full-batch k -means clustering on the same embedding is the recommended default when cross-year prevalence stability is required (train–test TVD 0.039 versus 0.569 under MiniBatch). We report silhouette-guided choices ( k = 6 severity, k = 4 context), cross-seed stability, feature ablations, and a 2023–2024 versus 2025 prevalence comparison. A Pearson χ 2 test on severity × context labels reveals strong statistical significance, yet Cramér’s V remains small—statistical association with limited practical coupling, consistent with complementary rather than redundant partitions. Limitations include police-reported injury counts; a coarse vehicle proxy; weak context geometry; and large MiniBatch context drift, which binds inference to within-year descriptive profiling unless analysts refit the model, add version labels, or adopt full-batch context clustering. The contribution is an integrated, reproducible profiling and governance workflow for dashboards and follow-on modelling—not a fixed multi-year cluster taxonomy.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorin Tataru & Artur Budzyński & Andreea Cristina Tataru, 2026. "Improving Road and Vehicle Safety Through Administrative Register Data: Sustainable Road Safety Analytics for Romania (2023–2025) via Dual Severity and Context Clustering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6853-:d:1984301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6853/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6853/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6853-:d:1984301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.