Author
Listed:
- Junfang Guo
(School of Economics, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China
Industry Research Institute for Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)
- Jiahui Lu
(School of Economics, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)
- Jie Yang
(School of Economics, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)
- Zhishuang Zhu
(School of Economics, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China
Industry Research Institute for Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)
- Wenjun Zhao
(School of Economics, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China
Industry Research Institute for Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)
Abstract
ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) performance is increasingly viewed as a strategic factor shaping firms’ innovation activities. However, existing studies have largely examined green innovation as a whole, with limited attention to low-carbon technological innovation as a distinct domain and insufficient understanding of its driving mechanisms and conditional heterogeneity. Using panel data on Chinese A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2024, this study employs a two-way fixed-effects framework to examine the effect of ESG performance on low-carbon technological innovation, and further investigates the underlying transmission mechanisms and heterogeneous effects. The results show that ESG significantly promotes low-carbon technological innovation, with a notably stronger effect on substantive innovation than on strategic innovation, indicating that ESG drives genuine technological advancement rather than superficial patent accumulation. Mechanism tests reveal that ESG facilitates innovation by easing financing constraints and enhancing government support. At the dimensional level, the environmental and social pillars exert significant positive effects, whereas the governance pillar does not. Heterogeneity analyses demonstrate that the promotional effect is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises, large firms, heavily polluting industries, and non-technology-intensive firms, revealing structural variation across firm characteristics. By isolating low-carbon innovation from the broader green innovation concept and identifying dual transmission channels, this study extends the literature on the economic consequences of ESG and provides evidence for designing differentiated green governance policies.
Suggested Citation
Junfang Guo & Jiahui Lu & Jie Yang & Zhishuang Zhu & Wenjun Zhao, 2026.
"Corporate ESG Performance and Low-Carbon Technology Innovation: Mechanism Analysis and Heterogeneity Tests,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-30, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6849-:d:1984311
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6849-:d:1984311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.