IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6838-d1983926.html

Energy Geographies in the Age of GeoAI: Research Trends, Gaps, and Future Directions

Author

Listed:
  • Xinming Andy Zhang

    (Department of Geography and Sustainability, University of Tennessee, 1000 Phillip Fulmer Way, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)

  • Qiusheng Wu

    (Department of Geography and Sustainability, University of Tennessee, 1000 Phillip Fulmer Way, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)

  • Yingkui Li

    (Department of Geography and Sustainability, University of Tennessee, 1000 Phillip Fulmer Way, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)

  • Jack Swab

    (Department of Geography and Sustainability, University of Tennessee, 1000 Phillip Fulmer Way, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)

Abstract

Energy Geographies has a unique position at the intersection of geospatial and social science, and it now faces a defining methodological development with the rapid rise in Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI). This paper examines where GeoAI has and has not been applied within energy research through two bibliometric analyses using the Dimensions database. The first establishes an updated picture of energy geographies scholarship from 2020 to 2026, mapping the field’s current priorities and geographic distribution as a baseline for evaluating GeoAI’s role. The second conducts a bibliometric analysis of GeoAI-specific energy publications from 2020 to 2026, which reveals significant GeoAI Application Gaps: a heavy concentration in energy extraction and production research and in renewable energy siting and grid optimization, while energy transition, justice, and the energy problems of underrepresented regions remain substantially underserved. GeoAI energy research is also more geographically concentrated than the broader field, dominated by a small number of countries, raising questions about the applicability of these tools to the energy challenges facing the rest of the world. We argue that this gap reflects a pattern of problem selection as much as technological limitation, and that energy geographers are well positioned to redirect the development of this new field. We outline three directions for future research: developing Explainable GeoAI to ensure transparency and accountability, expanding geographic coverage to address data biases that favor a small set of well-resourced countries, and confronting the computational energy paradox of carbon-intensive AI applied to sustainability-oriented research.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinming Andy Zhang & Qiusheng Wu & Yingkui Li & Jack Swab, 2026. "Energy Geographies in the Age of GeoAI: Research Trends, Gaps, and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-26, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6838-:d:1983926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6838/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6838/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6838-:d:1983926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.