IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6824-d1983614.html

Resident Heterogeneity in Health-Promoting Street Renewal: Evidence from Health Literacy—Activity Behavior Mismatch in Old Urban Neighborhoods

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyang Mu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shandong Jianzhu University, Ji’nan 250000, China)

  • Zhengyan Cheng

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shandong Jianzhu University, Ji’nan 250000, China)

  • Junjie Zhang

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shandong Jianzhu University, Ji’nan 250000, China)

  • Ruoqi Qian

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shandong Jianzhu University, Ji’nan 250000, China)

Abstract

Responding to residents’ differentiated health-promoting needs has become important for improving the adaptability of street renewal in old urban neighborhoods. Based on 1404 valid questionnaires from residents in old urban neighborhoods of Jinan, China, this study develops an analytical framework linking group classification, environmental responses, and renewal strategies from the perspective of health literacy–activity behavior mismatch. Health literacy and activity behavior indices were constructed, and K-means clustering was used to identify mismatch groups. Estimated marginal means, average marginal effects, and multiple-response analysis were then employed to compare group-specific response trajectories and improvement preferences across four street environmental dimensions: slow-mobility space, service function, natural aesthetics, and activity facilities. Further interpretation of the obtained analytical results demonstrates that the investigated resident samples are partitioned into four typical subgroups: behavior-driven, high-literacy/high-behavior, literacy-driven, and low-literacy/low-behavior groups. Slow-mobility space was mainly associated with participation willingness and mismatch adjustment; natural aesthetics was primarily related to environmental cognition and perceived attractiveness; activity facilities were more relevant to mismatch changes among low-literacy/low-behavior residents; and service function mainly provided everyday convenience support. Improvement preferences were generally concentrated on basic environmental conditions, especially traffic safety, natural environment, and public activity spaces. These findings provide empirical evidence for group-based health-promoting street renewal and highlight its relevance to socially inclusive and sustainable urban regeneration.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyang Mu & Zhengyan Cheng & Junjie Zhang & Ruoqi Qian, 2026. "Resident Heterogeneity in Health-Promoting Street Renewal: Evidence from Health Literacy—Activity Behavior Mismatch in Old Urban Neighborhoods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6824-:d:1983614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6824/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6824/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6824-:d:1983614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.