Author
Listed:
- Sasindu Samarawickrama
(Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)
- Tharaka Gunawardena
(Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)
- Priyan Mendis
(Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)
- Ding Wen Bao
(School of Architecture and Urban Design, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia)
Abstract
The growing adoption of prefabricated timber construction in Australia has highlighted persistent difficulties in integrating digital workflows between architectural design, structural engineering, and manufacturing. Although Building Information Modelling (BIM), Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM), and Computer Numerical Control (CNC) technologies are increasingly used, fragmented software environments, inconsistent data exchange, and limited early manufacturer involvement continue to cause information loss, manual rework, and design-to-manufacturing workflow gaps. This study provides a PRISMA-informed structured review of design-to-manufacturing integration in prefabricated timber construction, focusing on workflow stages, software ecosystems, interoperability issues, and manufacturer-ready data requirements. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 588 records from ScienceDirect and Web of Science were screened, resulting in 60 peer-reviewed studies. These were supplemented by 32 practice-based technical sources, including industry reports, software manuals, user guides, CNC/machinery manuals, and interface documents. The review maps current workflows for timber frames, trusses, and mass timber components, identifying recurring challenges such as fragmented responsibilities, insufficient data detail, incompatible software, repeated remodelling, and weak design-production continuity. Based on these findings, the paper proposes a conceptual digital integration framework emphasising early collaboration, shared parametric logic, and clearer manufacturer-ready data to support more reliable, resource-efficient, and sustainable design-to-manufacturing workflows in Australian prefabricated timber construction.
Suggested Citation
Sasindu Samarawickrama & Tharaka Gunawardena & Priyan Mendis & Ding Wen Bao, 2026.
"Design-to-Manufacturing Integration for Prefabricated Timber Construction in Australia: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework Linking BIM, CAD/CAM and CNC Workflows,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-30, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6790-:d:1983028
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6790-:d:1983028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.