Author
Listed:
- Walaa S. E. Ismaeel
(Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, The British University in Egypt, Al Shorouk City 11837, Egypt)
- Yara Talaat
(Sustainable Engineering Design and Construction Programme, Faculty of Engineering, The British University in Egypt, Al Shorouk City 11837, Egypt)
- Nour Taha
(Sustainable Engineering Design and Construction Programme, Faculty of Engineering, The British University in Egypt, Al Shorouk City 11837, Egypt)
Abstract
This study addresses the disconnect between environmental impact assessment (EIA) outputs and construction contract management, which limits the practical effectiveness of environmental decision-making in project delivery. To bridge this gap, ImpactPredict—a data-driven decision-support framework—is developed to integrate environmental impact data with environmental-based contractual risk assessment. The methodology combines: (1) severity–likelihood environmental scoring with contractual weighting to generate quantitative indicators of claim likelihood before and after mitigation; (2) developing the proposed framework using Microsoft Excel and Power BI; (3) validation using six case study energy projects in Egypt, enabling cross-case comparative analysis; and (4) statistical analysis to test the model’s sensitivity and uncertainty. The results show consistent reductions across all projects, with mitigation leading to an average 40% risk reduction across all case studies, and significant decreases in predicted claims. Linear regression analysis between initial contractual risk (CR) and residual contractual risk (RCR) produced the predictive equation R C ^ R = 4.93 + 0.351(CR). The regression coefficient and hypothesis testing (t = 3.367, p = 0.028 < 0.05) provide preliminary evidence that initial contractual risk is a statistically significant predictor of residual contractual risk. The coefficient of determination (R 2 = 0.758) indicates that approximately 75.8% of the variance in residual risk is explained by the initial risk conditions. In addition, low prediction error values (mean absolute error = 1.17; root mean square error = 1.28) demonstrate satisfactory predictive stability and model reliability. The sensitivity analysis indicates that the model exhibits proportional responsiveness to all input variables, with severity and likelihood identified as dominant drivers of risk magnitude, while contractual weighting governs risk translation into project performance outcomes. These findings confirm that environmental impacts can be operationalized as quantifiable contractual risk drivers. The study concludes that embedding contract-integrated environmental intelligence within accessible analytical platforms enhances decision-making, supports measurable performance improvement, and transforms EIA into a proactive risk management tool.
Suggested Citation
Walaa S. E. Ismaeel & Yara Talaat & Nour Taha, 2026.
"Contract-Integrated Environmental Impact Intelligence System,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-23, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6789-:d:1983027
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6789-:d:1983027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.