IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6783-d1982916.html

Spatial Accessibility, Equity, and Tourism Development Mismatch of Grade Scenic Spots in the Xizang–Sichuan Region, China: Implications for Sustainable Tourism Development

Author

Listed:
  • Suping Cui

    (School of Engineering, Xizang University, Lhasa 850000, China)

  • Jiahang Chen

    (School of Engineering, Xizang University, Lhasa 850000, China)

  • Weijie Xie

    (School of Engineering, Xizang University, Lhasa 850000, China)

  • Huining Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Xizang University, Lhasa 850000, China)

  • Junmeng Zhao

    (School of Science, Xizang University, Lhasa 850000, China)

  • Xinyan Wang

    (School of Engineering, Xizang University, Lhasa 850000, China)

  • Junzhe Teng

    (School of Ecology and Environment, Xizang University, Lhasa 850000, China)

  • Xiaofei Du

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Linchao Yang

    (School of Engineering, Xizang University, Lhasa 850000, China)

  • Baowen Yang

    (School of Engineering, Xizang University, Lhasa 850000, China)

Abstract

The Xizang–Sichuan region is rich in tourism resources, yet its complex geography and lagging transportation infrastructure have resulted in pronounced spatial disparities in tourism development. From a sustainability perspective, such disparities can lead to a ‘rich-get-richer’ cycle: over-tourism and ecological stress in high-accessibility cores, versus underdevelopment and resource idling in low-accessibility peripheries. To systematically examine the spatial structure of tourism in this region, this study uses counties as basic units and integrates the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with an improved gravity model for tourism network potential accessibility (TNPA) to assess regional tourism development levels and the network-based accessibility among counties. A comprehensive evaluation framework was established across three dimensions: tourism resource endowment, service capacity, and socio-economic support. Travel times between county centers were obtained from the Amap API, and a TNPA index was computed to reflect each county’s potential for tourism interaction with the rest of the region. Results indicate that resource endowment dominates the evaluation, with scenic quality as the critical factor. TNPA exhibits a pronounced core–periphery differentiation, with Chengdu and surrounding areas forming a high-value network core, while most counties in Xizang show extremely low network potential. Equity analysis reveals a significant imbalance in the distribution of network accessibility between Sichuan and Xizang. Under the baseline setting, the population-weighted Gini coefficient, coefficient of variation, and Theil index reach 0.677, 1.724, and 0.884, respectively, indicating that tourism network potential remains highly concentrated in a limited number of counties. The population-weighted mean TNPA of Sichuan is also far higher than that of Xizang, revealing a distinct interregional accessibility gap. The development–TNPA mismatch analysis further identifies counties where tourism development foundations are relatively strong but network integration remains weak. Robustness checks indicate that the high-development–low-TNPA pattern is not simply an artefact of the median-based classification, with the most evident cases mainly concentrated in Aba and Garze in western Sichuan and a few counties in Xizang. The study highlights the asymmetric relationships among resource endowment, network accessibility, and equity, providing a scientific basis for optimizing cross-regional tourism cooperation and transportation corridors in the Xizang–Sichuan region.

Suggested Citation

  • Suping Cui & Jiahang Chen & Weijie Xie & Huining Zhang & Junmeng Zhao & Xinyan Wang & Junzhe Teng & Xiaofei Du & Linchao Yang & Baowen Yang, 2026. "Spatial Accessibility, Equity, and Tourism Development Mismatch of Grade Scenic Spots in the Xizang–Sichuan Region, China: Implications for Sustainable Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-26, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6783-:d:1982916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6783/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6783/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6783-:d:1982916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.