Author
Listed:
- Alpheus D. Moalosi
(WSP Group Africa (Pty) Ltd., Maxwell Office Park, Magwa Crescent Building 1, Midrand 1685, South Africa
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Bridget F. Shaddock
(Earth & Environment Laboratory, WSP Group Africa (Pty) Ltd., 25 Main Avenue, Cnr Die Ou Pad & Main Avenue, Florida, Roodepoort 1709, South Africa
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Amina Nel
(Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
Abstract
Environmental risk assessment of landfill solid waste should include higher plants as indicators of toxicity to support sustainable waste management. This study evaluated solid waste from mining and power-generating industries using SANS 10234, a multidisciplinary approach that combined physicochemical analysis of waste samples and the Phytotoxkit bioassay to assess plant-based toxicity. Leachate extractions from samples identified as wastes of concern were evaluated using standard toxicity tests. Based on the Phytotoxkit results, Coal solid waste A, Clinker ash, and Chrome solid waste were identified as wastes of concern, whilst the whole effluent toxicity test results of the leachate indicated that these three samples pose a low risk to aquatic ecosystems. The phytotoxicity was attributed to the waste’s physicochemical parameters. Coal solid waste A expressed a low pH of 2.60 and a high electrical conductivity of 14,557 µS/cm, while Clinker ash presented a pH of 6.72 and an electrical conductivity value of 3685 µS/cm. These values were outside the optimal range for many plants to thrive. The presence of toxic elements in some samples may have contributed to the observed phytotoxicity. These results highlight that solid waste can present varying risks to both terrestrial and aquatic systems, reinforcing the importance of including higher plants in landfill risk assessments for sustainable waste management.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6770-:d:1982628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.