Author
Listed:
- Dimitrios Aidonis
(FarmB Digital Agriculture S.A., Capital Trade Center, Building B, Laertou 22, 55535 Thessaloniki, Greece
Department of Supply Chain Management, International Hellenic University, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)
- Lefteris Benos
(Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), Centre for Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH), 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)
- Dimitrios Kateris
(Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), Centre for Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH), 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)
- Patrizia Busato
(Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Polytechnic of Turin, Viale Mattioli 39, 10125 Torino, Italy)
- Claus Grøn Sørensen
(Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark)
- George Kyriakarakos
(FarmB Digital Agriculture S.A., Capital Trade Center, Building B, Laertou 22, 55535 Thessaloniki, Greece)
- Remigio Berruto
(Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Polytechnic of Turin, Viale Mattioli 39, 10125 Torino, Italy)
- Dionysis Bochtis
(FarmB Digital Agriculture S.A., Capital Trade Center, Building B, Laertou 22, 55535 Thessaloniki, Greece
Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), Centre for Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH), 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)
Abstract
This study provides a structured operational-to-financial roadmap for soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration in mineral soils as a specific carbon-farming pathway. It integrates SOC management; Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) execution; financial recognition; and farmer adoption barriers. A comparison of carbon farming pathways is first presented to investigate their strengths and limitations, highlighting the specific importance of SOC management in mineral soils. For high-integrity carbon accounting, SOC gains should be assessed not only for quantity, but also for additionality, permanence, uncertainty, leakage, lifecycle emissions, and transparent verification. Credible MRV frameworks operationalize this logic: monitoring quantifies SOC changes, reporting ensures transparency, and verification provides independent assurance for carbon credit issuance and financial recognition. However, MRV execution faces several challenges, including high spatial variability of SOC, slow accumulation rates, methodological uncertainty, and high costs that limit scalability and reduce trust among stakeholders. Financial incentives are available from both public and private sources, supporting long-term soil carbon stabilization, verified carbon removals, and corporate insetting projects. Yet, adoption remains constrained by uncertain payments, poor transparency, contract and permanence concerns, as well as learning and operational costs for farmers. Addressing these bottlenecks is essential for transforming mineral-soil SOC sequestration into a scalable, high-integrity climate and economic opportunity.
Suggested Citation
Dimitrios Aidonis & Lefteris Benos & Dimitrios Kateris & Patrizia Busato & Claus Grøn Sørensen & George Kyriakarakos & Remigio Berruto & Dionysis Bochtis, 2026.
"A Roadmap for High-Integrity Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration in Mineral Soils: From Potential to Verified Storage,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-40, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6753-:d:1982443
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6753-:d:1982443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.