IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6739-d1981993.html

Spatiotemporal Evolution and Spatial Conflicts of Production–Living–Ecological Spaces in Shenmu City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Sang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Yanxue Li

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

Abstract

Resource-based cities face complex land-use pressures. Examining the evolution of production–living–ecological spaces (PLESs) and the spatial conflicts associated with this evolution provides an important basis for reducing land-use tensions and promoting more coordinated and sustainable spatial development. Drawing on land-use records spanning 2000–2020, this study integrates a transfer-matrix approach, a PLES conflict assessment model, and spatial autocorrelation analysis to examine the spatiotemporal evolution of PLESs and their conflict patterns in Shenmu City, China. The results show that (1) industrial production land expanded more rapidly than any other land category, mainly through the conversion of agricultural production land. Agricultural production land continued to decrease as it was converted into both industrial production land and ecological land. Grassland served as an important transitional space between production and ecological spaces, with its evolution shifting from rapid expansion in the early period to relative stability in the later period. (2) In terms of spatial conflicts, moderate conflict remained the dominant category and generally increased over time. By contrast, strong and relatively strong conflicts decreased, while weak and relatively weak conflicts gradually increased. Spatially, conflict patterns shifted from highly concentrated areas in the southeastern resource-extraction zone to a more dispersed and balanced regional distribution. (3) Global Moran’s I decreased from 0.62 to 0.49, indicating a weakening of overall spatial clustering. High–High clusters contracted into fragmented patches, whereas Low–Low clusters continued to expand in the northwestern ecological zone, reflecting the gradual improvement of local environmental conditions. Overall, although spatial conflict intensity has decreased and strong conflicts have been substantially reduced, conflicts have shifted mainly toward moderate levels rather than being fully resolved. As the dominant and still expanding category, moderate conflict represents a potential risk that requires continuous monitoring and adaptive intervention. By focusing on a county-level resource-based city, this study provides a fine-grained empirical case. It identifies an evolutionary pattern characterized by the reduction in severe spatial conflicts and the accumulation of moderate conflicts, which differs from the patterns commonly observed in urbanization-driven cities. The findings suggest that spatial conflicts in resource-based cities are highly responsive to targeted ecological governance policies. Future sustainable spatial development should be promoted through differentiated zonal governance, ecological restoration, and the green transformation of the industrial structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Sang & Yanxue Li, 2026. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Spatial Conflicts of Production–Living–Ecological Spaces in Shenmu City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6739-:d:1981993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6739/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6739/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6739-:d:1981993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.