IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6735-d1981951.html

Integrated Assessment of Sustainable Development of the Agro-Industrial Complex in the BRICS Countries: Evidence from China, Russia and India

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitry Rodionov

    (Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint-Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Natalya Victorova

    (Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint-Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Andrey Zaytsev

    (Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint-Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Darya Tutueva

    (Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint-Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Alina Furtatova

    (Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint-Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Lingli Lyu

    (Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint-Petersburg 195251, Russia)

  • Natalya Abramchikova

    (Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint-Petersburg 195251, Russia)

Abstract

Achieving balanced development across economic, social, environmental, and agricultural domains remains a critical challenge for emerging economies. This study conducts a comparative assessment of sustainable development in the agro-industrial complex of China, Russia, and India over the period 2000–2023 within an extended SDG-based framework. The methodological approach combines a multi-dimensional indicator system (37 indicators) with the Entropy Weight Method to identify indicators with high temporal information contribution and the Equal Weighting Method to evaluate long-term performance, ensuring both sensitivity to structural changes and cross-country comparability. The results reveal differentiated development trajectories: China demonstrates steady and balanced growth across all dimensions; India shows consistent improvement driven by progress in social and infrastructure-related indicators; Russia exhibits a more volatile pattern with relatively strong social outcomes but persistent weaknesses in agricultural performance. The entropy-based analysis indicates that the indicators contributing most strongly to temporal differentiation vary significantly across countries, with infrastructure and energy transition prevailing in China, natural resource dynamics in Russia, and social and digital factors in India. These findings suggest that long-term development trajectories in the agro-industrial sector are associated with different configurations of resource interdependence, institutional capacity, and resource-use efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitry Rodionov & Natalya Victorova & Andrey Zaytsev & Darya Tutueva & Alina Furtatova & Lingli Lyu & Natalya Abramchikova, 2026. "Integrated Assessment of Sustainable Development of the Agro-Industrial Complex in the BRICS Countries: Evidence from China, Russia and India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-26, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6735-:d:1981951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6735/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6735/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6735-:d:1981951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.