Author
Listed:
- Xinlei Liu
(School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)
- Ya Yang
(Institute of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)
- Ping Shen
(Institute of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)
- Ying Lv
(Institute of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)
- Liu Yang
(Huanghuai Laboratory, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Xingyu Liu
(Institute of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)
Abstract
Coal-dominated resource-based cities face a structurally embedded carbon-neutrality gap, shaped by the simultaneous pressures of industrial carbon lock-in and ecological fragility. China’s dual-carbon targets impose severe transition pressure on such regions, where carbon-intensive industries, strong path dependence, and limited decarbonization flexibility compound the challenge. Forest carbon sinks offer a cost-effective approach for offsetting residual emissions. However, water scarcity and restricted land-carrying capacity impose hard ecological ceilings on sink expansion in semi-arid areas such as the Loess Plateau. Existing studies have largely focused on national or provincial scales, with few addressing the coupled dynamics of industrial emissions and water-limited sink capacity at the county level. This study examines Shenmu, China’s largest coal-producing county-level city and a national energy-chemical industrial base. Using time-series data spanning 2010–2025, we project multi-scenario carbon emissions via an extended STIRPAT model with ridge regression, estimate forest carbon sink potential through a growing-stock (GS) gradient model cross-validated against GM(1,1), and systematically quantify the resulting carbon-neutrality gap. The results show that energy activities dominate total emissions throughout, consistently exceeding 90% of the aggregate. Under the baseline scenario, emissions reach 407.96 MtCO 2 eq in 2060 without peaking; under moderate mitigation, emissions peak at 269.39 MtCO 2 eq in 2050; under strengthened mitigation, emissions peak at 225.80 MtCO 2 eq before 2040 and subsequently decline. Forest carbon sinks are projected to offset 2.1–11.2% of emissions by 2060 under all scenarios, constrained by climatic aridity, finite afforestation potential, and water–soil carrying capacity thresholds. The carbon-neutrality gap remains structurally positive across every scenario, reflecting a fundamental asymmetry between rigid emission growth and ecologically bounded sink capacity. These findings indicate that only an integrated pathway combining industrial restructuring, energy decarbonization, diversified ecological sinks, and CCUS deployment can substantially narrow the gap; carbon neutrality by 2060 is unattainable through natural sinks alone.
Suggested Citation
Xinlei Liu & Ya Yang & Ping Shen & Ying Lv & Liu Yang & Xingyu Liu, 2026.
"Carbon-Neutrality Gap in Resource-Based Cities: STIRPAT Simulation and Cross-Validation of Carbon-Sink Models,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-29, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6722-:d:1981761
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6722-:d:1981761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.