IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6649-d1980300.html

Input Modality Ablation for Sustainable Landslide Hazard Management Using U-Net: Fused DEM–Optical vs. Spectral vs. Terrain Representations in a Small-Sample Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Walter Chen

    (Department of Civil Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

  • Fuan Tsai

    (Center for Space and Remote Sensing Research, National Central University, No. 300, Zhongda Rd., Zhongli District, Taoyuan City 320317, Taiwan)

Abstract

Rapid and accurate landslide mapping is essential for disaster risk reduction and sustainable land management in landslide-prone mountainous regions. This study presents a U-Net semantic segmentation framework for pixel-wise landslide classification in the Laonung Creek Watershed of southern Taiwan using 96 annotated tiles derived from a very high-resolution DEM and SPOT-6 multispectral imagery. An input modality ablation experiment compares four configurations: a fused DEM–optical composite matching the visual input used by the annotators (annotation-coherent input), SPOT-6 natural color imagery, a DEM-derived terrain stack, and a six-channel multi-source stack combining all SPOT-6 bands with slope and curvature. All configurations use an identical EfficientNet-B0 U-Net architecture under a spatially blocked train/validation/test design with a fixed held-out test set of 29 tiles. The multi-source stack achieves the highest test Average Precision (AP) of 0.556 (95% CI: 0.463–0.643), whereas the annotation-coherent fused composite achieves AP = 0.511 (95% CI: 0.404–0.601); overlapping confidence intervals indicate that neither modality is definitively superior at this test-set size. The terrain-only configuration (AP = 0.152) confirms that optical information is essential for reliable delineation. A key methodological finding is that differential encoder–decoder learning rates caused rapid decoder overfitting; matched rates of 10 − 5 substantially stabilized training and are recommended as a conservative default for small-sample segmentation with pretrained encoders. At matched pixel positions, the best DL model achieves AP comparable to a companion Random Forest (DL: 0.847, RF: 0.824), while producing spatially coherent probability maps that support scalable landslide inventory compilation for sustainable hazard management.

Suggested Citation

  • Walter Chen & Fuan Tsai, 2026. "Input Modality Ablation for Sustainable Landslide Hazard Management Using U-Net: Fused DEM–Optical vs. Spectral vs. Terrain Representations in a Small-Sample Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-29, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6649-:d:1980300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6649/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6649/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6649-:d:1980300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.