Author
Listed:
- Jia Yang
(School of Law, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)
- Bingjiang Luan
(School of Economics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)
- Junbing Huang
(School of Economics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)
Abstract
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings have become central to sustainable finance, yet substantial disagreement among rating agencies creates information uncertainty that may extend beyond the rated firm itself. While the growing literature examines how ESG rating disagreement affects corporate behavior at the firm level, the question of whether such disagreement propagates along supply chains remains unexplored. Using matched customer–supplier panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies over the period 2015 to 2023, this paper investigates whether and how ESG rating disagreement of customer firms is related to the environmental performance of their suppliers. The baseline results indicate that greater ESG rating disagreement of customer firms is associated with a significant deterioration in supplier environmental performance in the subsequent year, and a one-standard-deviation increase in disagreement is associated with a 0.23% increase in supplier pollution emission intensity. Mechanism analysis points to three channels: greater ESG rating disagreement is associated with weaker green supply chain management practices, with tighter customer financing constraints that limit the resources available for supply chain governance, and with the lower quality of the ESG information transmitted to suppliers. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the negative spillover is more pronounced when suppliers are more dependent on the customer, when the supply chain relationship is more stable, when customer firms are privately owned, and when customers operate in pollution-intensive industries. A decomposition by rating pillar indicates that disagreement over the environmental pillar is the primary driver. These findings extend the ESG rating disagreement literature from the firm level to the supply chain network level, demonstrating that the costs of rating inconsistency are not confined to the rated entity but spill over to upstream partners.
Suggested Citation
Jia Yang & Bingjiang Luan & Junbing Huang, 2026.
"ESG Rating Disagreement and Supply Chain Green Spillovers: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-31, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6612-:d:1979163
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6612-:d:1979163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.