Author
Listed:
- Jizhong Li
(Glorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China)
- Jidan Huang
(Glorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China)
Abstract
Inbound tourism has become an important indicator of destination openness, service capacity, cultural communication, and sustainable governance. However, existing evaluations often separate visitor experience, destination competitiveness, and sustainability, making it difficult to diagnose how service quality supports long-term competitiveness. This study develops a sustainability-oriented framework for evaluating inbound tourism service quality in 10 representative Chinese cities. Nineteen indicators are organized into four dimensions: basic service provision, cultural and experiential perception, safety and emergency response, and sustainable and resilient development. A TIFN-AHP-TOPSIS model is used to integrate official statistics, public tourism information, online-review evidence, and expert judgments while retaining uncertainty and hesitation in qualitative assessments. The results show that Shanghai, Beijing, and Hangzhou form the leading tier; Shenzhen, Chengdu, Guangzhou, Sanya, and Xiamen form the balanced tier; and Xi’an and Chongqing form the potential tier. Robustness checks based on risk-preference adjustment, entropy-weighted TOPSIS, grey relational TOPSIS, and perception-indicator perturbation confirm the stability of the tier classification. The findings suggest that inbound tourism competitiveness depends not only on transport access and reception capacity but also on cultural interpretation, digital convenience, safety governance, ecological quality, and resilience. The framework provides a diagnostic tool for improving sustainable destination competitiveness.
Suggested Citation
Jizhong Li & Jidan Huang, 2026.
"Assessing the Inbound Tourism Service Quality and Competitiveness Under the Concept of Sustainable Development,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-30, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6607-:d:1979083
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6607-:d:1979083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.