Author
Listed:
- Nagrockienė Džigita
(Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)
- Pocius Edvinas
(Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)
- Ina Pundienė
(Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)
- Loreta Kanapeckienė
(Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)
Abstract
The growing global consumption of concrete is driving up the demand for cement, which has a negative environmental impact due to intensive CO 2 emissions. This impact can be reduced by replacing cement with reactive mineral industrial waste, simultaneously addressing the issue of waste accumulation in landfills. However, to ensure the effective use of such materials, it is essential to comprehensively investigate their influence on concrete durability. This study analyzes glass processing waste (GPW) generated during glass grinding. The waste is removed using water, resulting in the formation of glass processing waste. In the experiment, CEM I 42.5 R cement, GPW, sand, crushed dolomite stone, concrete sludge (CS), chemical admixtures, and water were used. In the tests, cement was replaced with glass processing waste in amounts ranging from 5% to 30%, analyzing a total of seven different compositions. The properties of the sustainable concrete mixture were evaluated, and the mechanical–physical properties of the hardened concrete were determined. Resistance to alkali–silica reaction was tested according to the RILEM AAR-4 methodology, while the environmental impact of glass processing waste was assessed using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The results showed that glass processing waste increases the concrete’s resistance to alkali corrosion: as the amount of waste increased, a smaller change in the linear dimensions of the specimens was recorded, and the lowest mass loss was found in the composition where 20% of the cement was replaced by glass processing waste. The environmental impact assessment confirmed a direct correlation—as the amount of glass waste increases, CO 2 emissions decrease proportionally. To produce sustainable concrete, it is recommended to use up to 20% glass processing waste: this allows for the maximum reduction in environmental impact while maintaining mechanical properties and high resistance to alkali–silica reaction.
Suggested Citation
Nagrockienė Džigita & Pocius Edvinas & Ina Pundienė & Loreta Kanapeckienė, 2026.
"Effect of Pozzolanic Glass Processing Waste on the Resistance of Sustainable Concrete to Alkali–Silica Reaction,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6598-:d:1978871
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6598-:d:1978871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.