IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6573-d1978081.html

Agent-Based Simulation and Mechanism Identification of Evacuation Efficiency in a Typical Built-Up Area Within a Desert Corridor County: A Case Study of Ruoqiang, Xinjiang

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Yang

    (Xinjiang Guoyuan Surveying, Mapping and Planning Design Institute Co., Ltd., Urumqi 841000, China)

  • Junliang Wang

    (Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Longhui He

    (Xinjiang Guoyuan Surveying, Mapping and Planning Design Institute Co., Ltd., Urumqi 841000, China)

  • Dongwei Huo

    (Xinjiang Guoyuan Surveying, Mapping and Planning Design Institute Co., Ltd., Urumqi 841000, China)

  • Shanshan Jiang

    (Xinjiang Guoyuan Surveying, Mapping and Planning Design Institute Co., Ltd., Urumqi 841000, China)

  • Hao Wu

    (School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

Research on evacuation in built-up areas within corridor-dependent counties is shifting from static shelter-coverage assessment toward dynamic simulation of spatial constraints, behavioral heterogeneity, and organizational capacity. This study takes a typical built-up area within Ruoqiang County, Xinjiang, as the simulation unit, rather than the entire county administrative area. GIS-based shortest-path analysis shows that the origin-to-nearest-shelter distance ranges from approximately 0.03 km to 0.64 km, indicating a short-distance pedestrian evacuation context. Based on multi-source spatial data from 2025, this study constructs an agent-based evacuation simulation framework and positions the model as a general evacuation-capacity experiment rather than a predictive simulation of a specific hazard process. Five scenarios are compared: fully disordered, 25% ordered, 50% ordered, 75% ordered, and fully ordered evacuation. Under the ideal ordered-information assumption, the simulated system reaches complete evacuation within 9.25 min, whereas the fully disordered scenario enters a low-level plateau after approximately 4.88 min, with a final evacuation rate of about 13%. The 25%, 50%, and 75% ordered scenarios reach plateau levels of approximately 37–38%, 61–62%, and 71–72%, respectively. Origin-type results further indicate that origins near shelters, directly connected to shelters, or embedded in continuous road networks respond more strongly to improved organization, whereas origins near boundaries, in low-connectivity areas, far from shelters, or adjacent to bottleneck nodes are more likely to generate late-stage retention. This study reveals how destination cognition, route organization, and origin spatial conditions jointly shape evacuation efficiency in a typical built-up area within a corridor-dependent county under specified scenario assumptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Yang & Junliang Wang & Longhui He & Dongwei Huo & Shanshan Jiang & Hao Wu, 2026. "Agent-Based Simulation and Mechanism Identification of Evacuation Efficiency in a Typical Built-Up Area Within a Desert Corridor County: A Case Study of Ruoqiang, Xinjiang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6573-:d:1978081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6573/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6573/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6573-:d:1978081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.