Author
Listed:
- Mengmeng Zhao
(Accelerated Marketing Insights, Quad Packaging, Inc., Greenville, SC 29601, USA)
- Shannon Anderson
(Accelerated Marketing Insights, Quad Packaging, Inc., Greenville, SC 29601, USA)
- Rupert Andrew Hurley
(Department of Food, Nutrition, and Packaging Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA)
- Kirsty McLaren
(Accelerated Marketing Insights, Quad Packaging, Inc., Greenville, SC 29601, USA)
- Skylar Sirdashney
(Quad/Graphics, Inc., Sussex, WI 53089, USA)
- Greta Joneson
(Quad/Graphics, Inc., Sussex, WI 53089, USA)
- Leah Ivancic
(Quad/Graphics, Inc., Sussex, WI 53089, USA)
- Carol Pan
(Quad/Graphics, Inc., Sussex, WI 53089, USA)
- Tim Ohnmacht
(Quad/Graphics, Inc., Sussex, WI 53089, USA)
Abstract
As e-commerce expands, packaging increasingly serves as a communication interface in at-home consumer environments, where it may influence how consumers interpret sustainability. Unlike retail settings, where disposal decisions may be externally guided, consumers in e-commerce contexts rely on material cues and on-package information to interpret recyclability and brand intent. This study aims to examine how paper-based and plastic packaging influence visual attention, disposal behavior, and brand perception in apparel e-commerce. A controlled experimental study (n = 91) was conducted using mobile eye-tracking, behavioral observation, post-experience surveys, and follow-up interviews. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three packaging conditions: a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) plastic bag, a translucent paper bag, or a hybrid paper-based bag combining kraft and translucent materials. Results show that paper-based formats generated greater visual engagement than plastic, with translucent paper eliciting longer fixation duration and higher fixation count ( p < 0.05). Recycling rates were higher for paper-based formats (70–77%) than plastic (53%), though not statistically significant. Perceived eco-friendliness differed significantly, with the hybrid paper format more strongly associated with environmental responsibility ( p < 0.001). Qualitative findings indicate that material statements and disposal instructions improve confidence in interpreting recyclability. These results suggest that packaging material plays a role in shaping consumer attention and perceived eco-friendliness in e-commerce contexts.
Suggested Citation
Mengmeng Zhao & Shannon Anderson & Rupert Andrew Hurley & Kirsty McLaren & Skylar Sirdashney & Greta Joneson & Leah Ivancic & Carol Pan & Tim Ohnmacht, 2026.
"Consumer Responses to Packaging Materials in E-Commerce: Effects on Visual Attention, Disposal Behavior, and Brand Perception,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6568-:d:1978030
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6568-:d:1978030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.