Author
Listed:
- Xia Yuan
(School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)
- Jiajun Xu
(School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)
Abstract
Achieving the coordinated development of the digital economy (DE), the tourism industry (TI) and the ecological environment (EE) is of great significance for regional sustainable development. This paper constructs a comprehensive evaluation index system for the digital economy–tourism industry–ecological environment (DTE) complex system. Indicator weights are determined via the entropy method, and the comprehensive development levels of the three subsystems in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region from 2010 to 2023 are systematically assessed. Based on this, the coupling coordination degree model is applied to measure the coordination of the DTE system, and the obstacle degree model is employed to identify the key factors restricting its coupling coordinated development. The results show the following: (1) From 2010 to 2023, the overall level of comprehensive development of the DE and EE in the YRD showed an upward trend, while the TI declined significantly during 2020–2022 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. (2) In terms of temporal evolution, the coupling coordination degree rose from 0.434 to 0.676 between 2010 and 2019, steadily improving from near disorder to primary coordination; although there were fluctuations between 2020 and 2023, it remained stable at a primary coordination level. Spatially, the region exhibited a “higher in the east, lower in the west” pattern. (3) From 2010 to 2019, the primary bottleneck in coordinated development stemmed from the DE subsystem; after 2020, the degree of constraints in the TI rose rapidly, creating a dual-system constraint pattern where the DE and the TI coexist. This study provides theoretical insights and practical recommendations for fostering positive DTE interactions in the YRD and offers valuable experience for other regions. This study has limitations regarding its research scale and indicator system, and it does not account for external influencing factors. Future research could adopt municipal or county-level analyses, apply causal inference methods such as panel Granger causality and system GMM, refine the evaluation index system, integrate internal and external factors, and thoroughly analyze the underlying mechanisms governing interactions within the DTE system.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6565-:d:1977988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.