IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6558-d1977842.html

Urban Waterlogging Risk Assessment Based on the Dynamic Response of Surface–Underground Transportation Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Minrui Wu

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Intelligent Construction and Operation, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
    School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Ximin Yuan

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Intelligent Construction and Operation, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
    School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Fuchang Tian

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Intelligent Construction and Operation, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
    School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Xiujie Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Intelligent Construction and Operation, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
    School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Jing Peng

    (School of Traffic Science and Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

Abstract

In order to improve the assessment of the dynamic risk of urban waterlogging, this study addresses the limitations of existing methods in capturing the responses of surface roads and subway systems to inundation, as well as the resulting spatiotemporal risks. Using the Hanyang District in Wuhan as a case study, the research proposes a framework for assessing urban waterlogging risks based on the dynamic inundation responses of surface and underground transport systems under various rainfall scenarios. The waterlogging process is simulated using seven representative rainfall scenarios with a hydrodynamic model that integrates a one-dimensional pipe network, a two-dimensional surface overland flow model, and a generalized underground space model. A coupled road–subway transportation network is developed to analyze traffic capacity degradation, path redistribution, and cascading failures caused by waterlogging disturbances. Quantified dynamic response indicators are integrated into the H-E-V-C framework to assess dynamic urban waterlogging risk. The results indicate that direct failure caused by water accumulation is typically the primary catalyst for extensive degradation of the transportation network, while the expansion of congestion and localized overload failures further exacerbate cascading effects. Different rainfall patterns influence not only peak risk but also the duration and spatial development of high-risk areas. Incorporating the dynamic response of the transport system enables a more accurate assessment of the degradation of emergency accessibility and the ongoing accumulation of localized high-risk areas. These findings highlight the importance of dynamic risk assessment in identifying time-varying urban vulnerabilities and supporting the planning of sustainable urban drainage, traffic management, and phased early warning systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Minrui Wu & Ximin Yuan & Fuchang Tian & Xiujie Wang & Jing Peng, 2026. "Urban Waterlogging Risk Assessment Based on the Dynamic Response of Surface–Underground Transportation Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-30, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6558-:d:1977842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6558/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6558/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6558-:d:1977842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.