IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6547-d1977243.html

The Performance, Combustion and Emissions of Mechanical Supercharging Modifications on a High-Speed Spark Ignition Engine

Author

Listed:
  • Gu Luo

    (Naval Architecture and Shipping College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China)

  • Nengsong Zhou

    (Naval Architecture and Shipping College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China)

  • Zejia Chen

    (Naval Architecture and Shipping College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China)

  • Junyou Zhang

    (School of Information and Control Engineering, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun 113001, China)

  • Fudong Wang

    (Naval Architecture and Shipping College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China)

  • Banglin Deng

    (Naval Architecture and Shipping College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China)

Abstract

Currently, high-speed gasoline engines are increasingly focusing on miniaturization and efficiency. Compared with turbocharging, mechanical supercharging is undoubtedly the more suitable technical approach for small, high-speed gasoline engines. To clarify the influence of the proposed supercharging approach on power, thermal efficiency and emissions within a broad range of engine speeds, this study designed two supercharging schemes (with different supercharger/crankshaft transmission ratios), and conducted bench tests comparing with the original engine. The results showed that the boost effect was more pronounced under medium load conditions. At full load, the high-speed supercharging scheme (94.5/86 ratio) on average improved torque by 10.8%, while the low-speed boost mode (86/61 ratio) only took effect after 5500 rpm. But at 60% load, 94.5/86 and 86/61, respectively, improved torque by 24.4% and 11.7%; thermal efficiencies of both supercharging schemes were almost the same and higher than that of the original operation by 0.8%; thus, the specific fuel consumption was reduced, on average, by ~9.5%. After boosting, the ignition phase was delayed due to the knock limit, but the high cylinder temperature promoted the recovery of the combustion rate in the later stage. In terms of emissions, NO x increased by 28% with the 94.5/86 scheme, while it decreased very slightly with the 86/61 scheme. CO rose by 3.7% under the 94.5/86 scheme, while it almost did not change under the 86/61 scheme operation, and HC increased by 13% and decreased by 21%, respectively, under the high and low boosting schemes. In conclusion, our proposed supercharging approach improved power and thermal efficiency and afforded a compromise emission effect. This study has revealed the performance trade-off rules of different boosting modes, which can provide important theoretical and technical support for the mechanical supercharging modification of high-speed gasoline engines.

Suggested Citation

  • Gu Luo & Nengsong Zhou & Zejia Chen & Junyou Zhang & Fudong Wang & Banglin Deng, 2026. "The Performance, Combustion and Emissions of Mechanical Supercharging Modifications on a High-Speed Spark Ignition Engine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6547-:d:1977243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6547/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6547/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6547-:d:1977243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.