IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6538-d1977027.html

Sustainable Circular Resource Recovery Performance Index for Comparing Takakura Composting and Vermicomposting of Municipal Organic Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Angélica Geovanna Zea Cobos

    (Area de Ciencias de la Vida, Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Cuenca 010105, Ecuador)

  • Elena Coyago-Cruz

    (Area de Ciencias de la Vida, Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Cuenca 010105, Ecuador)

  • Diego Alvarado Jiménez

    (Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador, Cuenca 010150, Ecuador)

  • Carola Jerves

    (Faculty of Chemical Sciences, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca 010107, Ecuador)

Abstract

Municipal organic waste management remains a major challenge for sustainable urban development, particularly in regions requiring decentralized treatment alternatives that reduce landfill dependency and promote circular resource recovery. This study compared Takakura composting and vermicomposting for the stabilization of municipal organic waste under decentralized operational conditions in the Ecuadorian Amazon and developed a Composite Circular Resource Recovery and Process Performance Index (CRRPPI) to evaluate resource recovery efficiency. Municipal organic waste was treated through Takakura composting, vermicomposting, and uncontrolled decomposition (control). Operational performance was assessed using material conversion efficiency, process productivity, nutrient recovery efficiency, nutrient productivity, and final physicochemical characteristics. These indicators were integrated into the CRRPPI framework to provide a multidimensional assessment of circular resource recovery performance. Takakura composting showed the highest operational efficiency, achieving material conversion efficiencies of up to 0.80, process productivity values of 1.23 kg day −1 , and superior nutrient recovery efficiencies for nitrogen (0.835), phosphorus (0.730), and potassium (0.880). The highest CRRPPI values were obtained for Takakura treatments (0.835–0.842), while vermicomposting showed intermediate performance, and the control treatment presented the lowest resource recovery efficiency (0.216). Sensitivity analysis confirmed ranking stability under ±20% weighting variations, and ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test identified significant differences among treatments ( p < 0.05). The results indicate that Takakura composting is an effective strategy for decentralized municipal organic waste valorization and nutrient recirculation. Furthermore, the proposed CRRPPI provides a practical exploratory framework for integrated evaluation of biological stabilization technologies by simultaneously considering operational performance and circular resource recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Angélica Geovanna Zea Cobos & Elena Coyago-Cruz & Diego Alvarado Jiménez & Carola Jerves, 2026. "Sustainable Circular Resource Recovery Performance Index for Comparing Takakura Composting and Vermicomposting of Municipal Organic Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-32, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6538-:d:1977027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6538/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6538/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6538-:d:1977027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.