Author
Listed:
- Miguel F. Ferrer Pareja
(University Institute of Intelligent Systems and Numerical Applications in Engineering, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain)
- Carlos Sánchez Morales
(Department of Process Engineering, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain)
- Federico León Zerpa
(Department of Process Engineering, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain)
- Alejandro Ramos Martín
(University Institute of Intelligent Systems and Numerical Applications in Engineering, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain)
Abstract
Energy-efficient operation of industrial thermal systems is a key requirement for sustainable manufacturing and resource-aware process design, particularly under environmental constraints such as dew-point conditions. In this context, minimizing energy consumption while maintaining stable thermal regulation is essential to reduce operational costs and improve system sustainability. This work presents an energy-aware experimental comparison of three control strategies—classical PID, fractional-order PID (FOPID), and hysteresis control—applied to a real thermoelectric thermal regulation system operating under dynamic ambient conditions and dew-point constraints. Unlike conventional control studies focused primarily on tracking performance, this research adopts a sustainability-oriented multi-criteria evaluation framework that explicitly positions energy consumption as a first-order assessment dimension alongside thermal regulation quality and control effort. A set of physically consistent performance indicators is introduced, including total energy consumption, control effort, energy-per-regulation metrics, and a global energy efficiency index, enabling a comprehensive assessment of industrial thermal control strategies from a resource efficiency perspective. Experimental results demonstrate that controller evaluation strongly depends on the inclusion of energy-based metrics. While PID control achieves competitive tracking performance with low error, FOPID provides the best overall trade-off between thermal accuracy and energy consumption, resulting in the highest energy efficiency index. In contrast, hysteresis control, despite its structural simplicity and robustness, leads to higher energy usage due to frequent switching dynamics, reducing its suitability for energy-constrained sustainable applications. The results highlight that thermal regulation near dew-point constraints should be evaluated through an energy-aware multi-criteria framework rather than through pure tracking metrics, enabling a more complete characterization of controller performance for sustainable industrial applications. The proposed framework provides a scalable methodology for evaluating and designing energy-efficient control strategies, supporting sustainable industrial operation and contributing to resource optimization principles aligned with circular economy objectives.
Suggested Citation
Miguel F. Ferrer Pareja & Carlos Sánchez Morales & Federico León Zerpa & Alejandro Ramos Martín, 2026.
"Energy-Aware Thermal Regulation for Sustainable Industrial Systems Under Dew-Point Constraints: A Comparative Experimental Study of Control Strategies,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6528-:d:1976612
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6528-:d:1976612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.