IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6526-d1976430.html

Does Government Data Governance Promote Firms’ Technological Catch-Up? Evidence from the Establishment of Big Data Administrations in China

Author

Listed:
  • Weihong Xie

    (School of Economics, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
    Digital Economy and Data Governance Laboratory, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China)

  • Pu Wang

    (School of Economics, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
    Digital Economy and Data Governance Laboratory, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China)

  • Kaixian Liao

    (School of Economics, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China)

  • Man Lin

    (School of Economics, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
    Digital Economy and Data Governance Laboratory, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China)

  • Dylan Zheng

    (School of Economics, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
    Institute of Big Data Strategy, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China)

Abstract

Government data governance has become an important institutional mechanism for reducing information frictions, improving data-resource allocation, and supporting firm innovation in the digital economy. However, whether government data governance can promote firms’ technological catch-up remains insufficiently understood. Based on the quasi-natural experiment of the establishment of Big Data Administrations, this study constructs a multi-period difference-in-differences model to examine the impact of government data governance on firms’ technological catch-up. Using panel data from Chinese A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2021, the DID estimates indicate that the establishment of Big Data Administrations significantly improves firms’ technological catch-up. This estimated effect remains robust across placebo tests, specifications controlling for differential trends associated with pre-treatment city characteristics, and double/debiased machine learning estimation. Mechanism analyses provide evidence consistent with three channels: technology stimulation, digital-ecosystem optimization, and competition strengthening. Heterogeneity analyses further show that the effect is evident among non-state-owned enterprises, firms with higher information asymmetry, and larger firms. Additional spatial analyses suggest that neighboring cities’ data governance capacity does not generate stable positive spillovers; instead, it may be associated with negative spatial externalities, potentially reflecting siphoning or competitive crowding-out pressures. These findings highlight government data governance as an institutional driver of firm technological progress and provide policy implications for improving digital governance capacity, optimizing digital ecosystems, and promoting high-quality development.

Suggested Citation

  • Weihong Xie & Pu Wang & Kaixian Liao & Man Lin & Dylan Zheng, 2026. "Does Government Data Governance Promote Firms’ Technological Catch-Up? Evidence from the Establishment of Big Data Administrations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-39, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6526-:d:1976430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6526/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6526/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6526-:d:1976430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.