IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6500-d1976025.html

Integrative Assessment of Morphological, Leaf-Anatomical, Edaphic, and DNA-Barcode Variation in Sibiraea altaiensis (Laxm.) C.K.Schneid. and Sibiraea tianschanica (Krasn.) Pojark. from Kazakhstan: Implications for Sustainable Conservation

Author

Listed:
  • Zhanylkan Alemseitova

    (Laboratory “NatureLab”, Astana International University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Anar Myrzagaliyeva

    (Laboratory “NatureLab”, Astana International University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Talant Samarkhanov

    (Laboratory “NatureLab”, Astana International University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Serik Irsaliyev

    (Laboratory “NatureLab”, Astana International University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Shynar Tustubayeva

    (Laboratory “NatureLab”, Astana International University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Aidyn Orazov

    (Laboratory “NatureLab”, Astana International University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Mountain ecosystems of Kazakhstan host geographically isolated Sibiraea populations, whose taxonomic status is complicated by overlapping morphology, environmental plasticity, and conflicting nomenclatural treatments. We compared 177 adult shrubs sampled at nine elevation-stratified sublocalities nested within three regional analytical groups (two S. altaiensis groups, n = 60 each; one S. tianschanica group, n = 57) using whole-shrub morphology, quantitative leaf anatomy, four soil variables, and a preliminary four-locus DNA-barcode comparison based on eight taxon-level consensus sequences (two taxa × four loci). One-way ANOVA identified regional-group differences in bush width (F(2,174) = 8.89, p < 0.001), vegetative offshoot number (F(2,174) = 21.85, p < 0.001), leaf-blade thickness (F(2,174) = 21.09, p < 0.001), soil pH (F(2,174) = 72.61, p < 0.001), electrical conductivity (F(2,174) = 41.22, p < 0.001), total nitrogen (F(2,174) = 40.21, p < 0.001), and total carbon (F(2,174) = 39.00, p < 0.001). In contrast, plant height and several vascular traits did not differ significantly, and most soil-trait associations were weak (| ρ | ≤ 0.33). Across ITS, matK/KIM, psbA-trnH, and rbcL, the concatenated alignment showed 99.49% identity and an uncorrected p-distance of 0.51%; psbA-trnH (0.97%) and ITS (0.69%) were the most variable loci. The combined evidence demonstrates regional phenotypic and edaphic differentiation but does not establish independent evolutionary lineages because taxon and geography are confounded, and individual-level genetic variation was sparsely sampled. By establishing measurable baselines for demographic monitoring, habitat protection, provenance-based ex situ conservation, and future restoration, the study directly supports the sustainable management and long-term resilience of rare mountain-plant populations in Kazakhstan.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhanylkan Alemseitova & Anar Myrzagaliyeva & Talant Samarkhanov & Serik Irsaliyev & Shynar Tustubayeva & Aidyn Orazov, 2026. "Integrative Assessment of Morphological, Leaf-Anatomical, Edaphic, and DNA-Barcode Variation in Sibiraea altaiensis (Laxm.) C.K.Schneid. and Sibiraea tianschanica (Krasn.) Pojark. from Kazakhstan: Implications for Sustainable Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6500-:d:1976025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6500/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6500/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6500-:d:1976025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.