IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6488-d1975758.html

A ChiMerge–WOE Ensemble Learning Framework for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in Jiuzhaigou County, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yujie Liu

    (College of Environmental and Disaster Governance, University of Emergency Management, Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Lili Zhang

    (College of Environmental and Disaster Governance, University of Emergency Management, Sanhe 065201, China
    Hebei Key Laboratory of Resource and Environmental Disaster Mechanism and Risk Monitoring, Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Yaowen Zhang

    (College of Environmental and Disaster Governance, University of Emergency Management, Sanhe 065201, China
    Hebei Key Laboratory of Resource and Environmental Disaster Mechanism and Risk Monitoring, Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Yunsheng Yao

    (College of Environmental and Disaster Governance, University of Emergency Management, Sanhe 065201, China
    Hebei Key Laboratory of Resource and Environmental Disaster Mechanism and Risk Monitoring, Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Zhicheng Bao

    (Jiangxi Earthquake Agency, Nanchang 330039, China)

Abstract

Landslide susceptibility assessment is important for disaster prevention and sustainable land-use planning in mountainous regions. However, conventional discretization methods often overlook threshold effects in conditioning factors, and many machine learning models still have limited interpretability. This study develops an integrated framework that combines ChiMerge discretization, Weight of Evidence (WOE) transformation, and tree-based ensemble learning to map landslide susceptibility in Jiuzhaigou County, Sichuan Province, China. A landslide inventory of 164 points was compiled from field investigations and hazard records, and fourteen topographic, geological, and environmental conditioning factors were derived from multi-source spatial datasets. Continuous factors were discretized using ChiMerge, a supervised chi-square-based discretization method that identifies statistically meaningful thresholds according to the distributions of landslide and non-landslide samples. WOE values were then calculated to quantify the association between each factor class and landslide occurrence. Three WOE-based ensemble models, WOE-CatBoost, WOE-LightGBM, and WOE-RF, were constructed and compared. All models showed high predictive performance (AUC > 0.90), with WOE-CatBoost performing best (AUC = 0.9432). Its high and very high susceptibility zones covered 28.59% of the study area but contained 85.96% of observed landslides. High-risk areas were mainly concentrated in steep valleys, fractured lithological zones, erosion belts, and areas affected by engineering activities, such as road construction, slope cutting, tourism infrastructure development, and settlement expansion. The proposed framework improves prediction accuracy and interpretability and provides spatial support for landslide prevention and sustainable land-use management.

Suggested Citation

  • Yujie Liu & Lili Zhang & Yaowen Zhang & Yunsheng Yao & Zhicheng Bao, 2026. "A ChiMerge–WOE Ensemble Learning Framework for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in Jiuzhaigou County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6488-:d:1975758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6488/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6488/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6488-:d:1975758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.