Author
Listed:
- Deogratius Marenge
(Faculty of Architecture and Arts, Hasselt University, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ardhi University, Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 35176, Tanzania)
- Bram Vandoren
(Faculty of Engineering Technology, Hasselt University, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium)
- Elke Knapen
(Faculty of Architecture and Arts, Hasselt University, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium)
- Shadrack Sabai
(Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ardhi University, Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 35176, Tanzania)
Abstract
Urbanisation-driven housing demand and the environmental burden of sewage sludge disposal highlight the need for low-carbon, circular construction materials. This study evaluates incinerated sanitary sludge ash (ISSA) as a supplementary cementitious material in stabilised earth blocks, aiming to reduce the use of cement and lime while valorising waste sludge. Lateritic soil blocks were produced with a binder-to-soil ratio of 1:7 by mass, in which ISSA partially replaced the primary stabilising binder (cement or lime) at a replacement level of 10–40% within the binder fraction. ISSA’s mineralogical characteristics were analysed using XRD and XRF. The compressive strength and density of earth blocks were measured at 7 and 28 days under curing conditions (29–36 °C; 60–75% humidity). Cement-stabilised blocks were water-cured to support cement hydration, whereas lime-stabilised blocks were air-cured to promote carbonation and pozzolanic reactions. The results, therefore, compared practical binder-specific curing regimes rather than strictly identical curing environments. ISSA exhibited moderate pozzolanic potential, and its incorporation enabled substantial partial replacement of both binders. Cement-stabilised blocks achieved higher strengths, up to 7.7 MPa, after 28 days of curing, whereas lime-stabilised blocks developed strength more gradually, reaching 4.8 MPa. Optimal mixtures were identified at 40% cement + 60% ISSA and 30% lime + 70% ISSA, balancing mechanical performance and binder reduction. A positive density–strength relationship was observed, but chemical bonding predominated over densification effects. ISSA-based stabilised earth blocks show promising structural performance and reduced binder use, but durability and life-cycle assessment need further evaluation before large-scale implementation.
Suggested Citation
Deogratius Marenge & Bram Vandoren & Elke Knapen & Shadrack Sabai, 2026.
"Development and Performance Evaluation of Sustainable Earth Blocks Incorporating Incinerated Sanitary Sludge Ash,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-20, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6471-:d:1975443
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6471-:d:1975443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.