IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6458-d1975062.html

Optimizing Production–Living–Ecological Space Under Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity Constraints: Evidence from Daye City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zikai Zhou

    (Faculty of Geographic Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Chuanqiang Yang

    (Faculty of Geographic Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Wenzhuo Zhang

    (Faculty of Geographic Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Chenglin Yang

    (Faculty of Geographic Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Lang Shi

    (Faculty of Geographic Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Qi Feng

    (Key Laboratory for Environment and Disaster Monitoring and Evaluation of Hubei, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430077, China)

  • Tao Liu

    (Faculty of Geographic Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
    Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response, Wuhan 430062, China)

Abstract

Evaluating resource and environmental carrying capacity (RECC) serves as a fundamental approach for assessing regional environmental baselines and is widely applied in territorial spatial planning. Focusing on Daye City—a characteristic resource-exhausted city in Hubei Province—this study developed a comprehensive RECC evaluation system. By integrating the obstacle degree model, hotspot analysis, and Geodetector, we investigated the spatial differentiation mechanisms of RECC and the resulting production–living–ecological (PLE) spatial conflicts, ultimately proposing targeted optimization pathways. The core findings are as follows: (1) The RECC of Daye City exhibits pronounced spatial polarization and a distinct north–south gradient. (2) The spatial stress of industrial/mining land emerges as the primary obstacle (36.47%). Together with geological hazard risk and soil erosion sensitivity, it forms a core constraint chain. The highly significant hotspots of these factors strongly overlap in the north-central mining districts. (3) Geodetector analysis reveals robust bivariate and nonlinear enhancement effects among these core obstacle factors. This indicates that the cascading vicious cycle of mining disturbance, ecological degradation, and declining carrying capacity fundamentally underlies the constrained RECC in mining regions. (4) PLE spatial conflicts across the study area are dominated by production–ecological conflicts (47.73%), presenting a spatial pattern that heavily couples with the polarized obstacle zones. Based on these findings, this study proposes differentiated regulation strategies centered on mitigating mining-induced stress and interrupting the cascading transmission of disaster risks. These strategies aim to restructure and optimize the territorial spatial pattern, providing robust quantitative decision support for the sustainable transformation of similar resource-exhausted cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Zikai Zhou & Chuanqiang Yang & Wenzhuo Zhang & Chenglin Yang & Lang Shi & Qi Feng & Tao Liu, 2026. "Optimizing Production–Living–Ecological Space Under Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity Constraints: Evidence from Daye City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6458-:d:1975062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6458/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6458/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6458-:d:1975062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.