IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6455-d1974993.html

Do Vehicle Restrictions on Urban Expressways Reduce Carbon Emissions Across the Urban Road Network? Short-Run and Longer-Run Evidence from Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Yizhe Huang

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China
    Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Digital Road Construction Technology, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Cunzhuo Liu

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China
    Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Digital Road Construction Technology, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Chengying Hua

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China
    Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Digital Road Construction Technology, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Yibin Zhang

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China
    Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Digital Road Construction Technology, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Alica Kalašová

    (Department of Road and Urban Transport, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Žilina; 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Shuichao Zhang

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China
    Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Digital Road Construction Technology, Ningbo 315211, China)

Abstract

Vehicle restrictions on urban expressways are widely used to relieve traffic congestion and reduce traffic emissions. However, the effects of such restrictions should be assessed over the wider urban road network rather than on expressways alone, and over both short-run and longer-run periods. This study empirically investigates the impacts of vehicle restriction policies on network-level emissions in Shanghai. The network-level vehicle emissions are dynamically estimated using a carbon-emissions macroscopic fundamental diagram (CE-MFD) model based on taxi trajectory data and loop detector data. The effects are then identified using a spatial difference-in-differences (SDID) framework, while geographically weighted regression (GWR) is used to examine spatial heterogeneity in the associated factors. The results show that extending the restriction periods reduced carbon emissions across the urban road network by 9.96% after one month and by 17.93% after one year. The effects are spatially heterogeneous and are associated with population, road-network characteristics, parking supply, and ramp configuration. These findings suggest that the sustainability impacts depend not only on the restrictions themselves, but also on traffic redistribution and local network conditions. Findings provide empirical evidence for designing sustainability-oriented traffic strategies, underscoring the importance of evaluating emissions outcomes across the urban road network over both short-run and longer-run horizons.

Suggested Citation

  • Yizhe Huang & Cunzhuo Liu & Chengying Hua & Yibin Zhang & Alica Kalašová & Shuichao Zhang, 2026. "Do Vehicle Restrictions on Urban Expressways Reduce Carbon Emissions Across the Urban Road Network? Short-Run and Longer-Run Evidence from Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6455-:d:1974993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6455/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6455/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6455-:d:1974993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.