IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6445-d1974818.html

Toward Sustainable Digital Education in Biology: Evaluating Educators’ Perceptions and Adoption Intentions for a Virtual Laboratory Toolkit from Four European Contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Eleni Dafli

    (School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ioanna Dratsiou

    (School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Efi Nisiforou

    (School of Education, Department of Education, University of Nicosia, Nicosia CY-2417, Cyprus)

  • Panayiota Mylona

    (Ministry of Education Sports and Youth, Nicosia CY-1434, Cyprus)

  • Blanca Puig

    (Faculty of Education Sciences, Department of Applied learning, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Gabriel Lazar

    (Ascendia SA, 010873 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Persoulla Nicolaou

    (Department of Basic and Clinical Sciences, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia CY-2417, Cyprus)

  • Panagiotis D. Bamidis

    (School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Stella A. Nicolaou

    (School of Life and Health Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, University of Nicosia, Nicosia CY-2417, Cyprus)

Abstract

Despite growing interest in Virtual Labs (VLs), limited research examines the factors influencing educators’ willingness to adopt them through the lens of inquiry-based learning (IBL). This exploratory pilot study evaluates educators’ interaction with the VHEalthLab VLs toolkit, examining their perceptions on usability, pedagogical value, IBL support, and intention to use. The study combines IBL, as a pedagogical lens, with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) within a Triple Bottom Line sustainability framework aligned with Sustainable Development Goals 4 and 10. Using an exploratory cross-sectional design with an embedded qualitative component, data were collected from seventy Biology educators across four European countries (Cyprus, Greece, Romania, Spain) through two structured questionnaires. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, directed content analysis, and joint display integration. Findings indicate that adoption intention was associated primarily with pedagogical rather than technological factors; IBL alignment showed the strongest association with intention to implement VLs (r = 0.63, p < 0.001), while perceived usefulness was most strongly associated with pedagogical materials (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). Assessment and inclusion functioned as quality criteria rather than factors associated with adoption intention. Educators consistently endorsed VLs as complements to physical laboratories, with their perceptions suggesting potential environmental, economic, and social sustainability implications within a blended model.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleni Dafli & Ioanna Dratsiou & Efi Nisiforou & Panayiota Mylona & Blanca Puig & Gabriel Lazar & Persoulla Nicolaou & Panagiotis D. Bamidis & Stella A. Nicolaou, 2026. "Toward Sustainable Digital Education in Biology: Evaluating Educators’ Perceptions and Adoption Intentions for a Virtual Laboratory Toolkit from Four European Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6445-:d:1974818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6445/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6445/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6445-:d:1974818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.