IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i13p6431-d1974441.html

National Appraisals Speak Louder for Attitudes than for Intentions: Distal and Proximate Risk–Benefit Perceptions of Climate Change in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yeheng Pan

    (School of Communication, Soochow University, Suzhou 215031, China
    Institute of Applied Ethics, Soochow University, Suzhou 215031, China)

  • Hepeng Jia

    (School of Communication, Soochow University, Suzhou 215031, China)

Abstract

Risk perception has long been treated as a key driver of public climate attitudes and climate-friendly behaviors. Although prior studies have reported relatively modest levels of perceived personal climate threat among the Chinese public, they have also found strong recognition of anthropogenic climate change and solid support for climate policies. However, it remains unclear whether the relatively modest perceived threat to personal climate among Chinese respondents is associated with a lower willingness to engage in climate-friendly behaviors. To address this question, this study extended the multi-level risk and benefit framework to investigate how personal, societal, and national risk and benefit perceptions, and their associations with climate attitudes and behavioral willingness, were perceived via a national survey of Chinese respondents (N = 1500). Empirical analyses, however, show that personal and societal appraisals are not clearly distinguishable, whereas national-level appraisals form a distinct dimension. Regression results further indicate a systematic divergence in predictive patterns across appraisal domains. National-level appraisals are more strongly associated with climate attitudes, whereas proximate appraisals, particularly perceived personal benefits, are more closely related to behavioral willingness. While explaining the apparent paradox of relatively low perceived personal climate risk but comparatively strong climate attitudes in China, these findings extend research on the attitude–behavior gap by suggesting that national-level and proximate appraisals may play different roles in relation to climate-related attitudes and behavioral intentions in contexts characterized by strong state involvement in climate governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeheng Pan & Hepeng Jia, 2026. "National Appraisals Speak Louder for Attitudes than for Intentions: Distal and Proximate Risk–Benefit Perceptions of Climate Change in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6431-:d:1974441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6431/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/13/6431/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6431-:d:1974441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.