Author
Listed:
- Davids Kronkalns
(Faculty of Computer Science, Information Technology and Energy, Riga Technical University, 12-1 Azenes Str., LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)
- Leo Jansons
(Faculty of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Riga Technical University, 6A Kipsala Street, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)
- Laila Zemite
(Riga Nordic University, 1-5 Valerijas Seiles Str., LV-1019 Riga, Latvia)
- Ilmars Bode
(Faculty of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Riga Technical University, 6A Kipsala Street, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)
Abstract
This study addresses the technical, environmental, economic, and systemic role of multi-apartment residential buildings as hydrogen consumption nodes within urban energy systems. A representative five-story building comprising 30 apartments and 2400–2800 m 2 of heated floor area, located in a cold European climate, was modelled with an annual heat demand of approximately 185,000 kWh. Four heating configurations were assessed: a conventional natural gas/biomethane boiler (baseline), a hydrogen boiler, a hydrogen-fuel-cell combined heat and power (CHP) system, and a hybrid heat-pump–hydrogen solution. Dynamic simulations indicate that all hydrogen-based systems can fully satisfy space heating and domestic hot water demand without modifications to the internal hydronic distribution network. The fuel cell CHP achieved an overall efficiency of 93%. It generated approximately 54,000 kWh/year of on-site electricity, while the hybrid configuration reached a seasonal efficiency of 108% and the highest primary energy reduction (46%). Operational CO 2 emissions decreased from 37,800 kg/year (gas baseline) to 1900 kg/year (green hydrogen boiler), 1200 kg/year (fuel cell CHP), and 900 kg/year (hybrid system), corresponding to reductions of up to 98%. Peak-load analysis demonstrated improved operational stability in CHP and hybrid systems, characterised by reduced cycling frequency and enhanced thermal resilience through hydrogen storage integration. Capital expenditure (CAPEX) ranged from 41,000 EUR (gas baseline) to 101,000 EUR (fuel cell CHP), reflecting additional storage, safety, and control requirements. Over a 20-year lifecycle (5% discount rate), the hybrid system achieved the lowest levelized cost of heat (0.076 EUR/kWh), followed by fuel cell CHP (0.081 EUR/kWh), compared to 0.087 EUR/kWh for gas. Payback periods ranged between 9 and 13 years, depending on configuration and hydrogen pricing assumptions. Sensitivity analysis identified a break-even hydrogen price of approximately 0.085 EUR/kWh, while carbon pricing above 100 EUR/t CO 2 significantly improves economic competitiveness. District-scale aggregation modelling suggests that hydrogen-equipped multi-apartment buildings can reduce grid electricity imports by 30–40% through on-site generation and seasonal storage. The findings confirm that multi-apartment buildings offer structural and economic advantages for early hydrogen deployment compared to dispersed housing typologies. By combining high demand density, centralised infrastructure, and compatibility with sector-coupling strategies, such buildings can function as distributed energy hubs within decarbonized urban systems.
Suggested Citation
Davids Kronkalns & Leo Jansons & Laila Zemite & Ilmars Bode, 2026.
"Decarbonizing Multi-Apartment Residential Buildings with Hydrogen: Performance, Costs, and Urban Integration,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-33, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6422-:d:1974213
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6422-:d:1974213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.