Author
Listed:
- Beatrice Marchi
(Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy)
- Enrico Bertagna
(Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy)
- Lucio E. Zavanella
(Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy)
Abstract
The increasing frequency of extreme weather events, particularly hailstorms, driven by climate change, poses growing threats to the resilience, environmental sustainability, and long-term performance of photovoltaic (PV) systems. This study evaluates the environmental impacts of a 12 kWp rooftop PV installation in Brescia, northern Italy, through a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of three system configurations: a standard unprotected system (Scenario A), one equipped with a retractable polycarbonate hail-protection panel with automated weather-sensor activation (Scenario B), and one using thicker reinforced front-glass modules (Scenario C). The analysis follows a cradle-to-gate plus operational maintenance phase (30-year horizon, excluding end-of-life) system boundary and employs the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) methodology across 18 environmental impact categories. A novel integration of the Social Discount Rate (SDR) to the LCA framework—constituting a Discounted LCA (D-LCA)—incorporates both temporal discounting and risk dimensions into the environmental evaluation. A structured PESTEL-based risk taxonomy is applied to derive scenario-specific SDRs, with the Environmental risk category as the key differentiator between configurations. The static LCA identifies Scenario A as the lowest-impact option, while the D-LCA framework reverses this ranking: Scenario C achieves the highest Net Present Value of Emissions, followed by Scenario A. A negative NPV-E for Scenario B reflects the temporal cost of a large, front-loaded construction debt rather than absolute environmental harm. D-LCA framework should be interpreted as a complement to the full 18-category static LCIA profile, not a replacement. These results demonstrate that risk-informed D-LCA provides a more policy-relevant environmental sustainability assessment than static LCA for long-lived energy infrastructure subject to climate-driven operational risks.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:13:p:6388-:d:1973475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.