IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i12p6353-d1972516.html

Study of Sustainable Rail Wagon Unloading in a Real-Life Scenario Based on a Multi-Criteria Decision Framework Under Industry 5.0 Principles

Author

Listed:
  • Ayoub Raziq

    (IESI Laboratory, ENSET Mohammedia, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Mohammedia 28810, Morocco)

  • Mohamed El Khaili

    (IESI Laboratory, ENSET Mohammedia, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Mohammedia 28810, Morocco)

  • Abdellah Zamma

    (M2S2I Laboratory, ENSET Mohammedia, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Mohammedia 28810, Morocco)

  • Hasna Nhaila

    (IESI Laboratory, ENSET Mohammedia, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Mohammedia 28810, Morocco)

Abstract

This study aims to improve wagon unloading processes in a real industrial context characterized by operational variability, process constraints, and strict performance requirements. Traditional decision-making approaches in such contexts often rely on single performance indicators, which may lead to suboptimal and less sustainable decisions. In line with Industry 5.0 principles, which emphasize human-centricity, resilience, and sustainability, this paper proposes a multi-criteria decision framework to support more balanced and adaptive operational decisions. A real-world case study based on anonymized industrial data is used to evaluate different arrival-track operational configurations. The proposed model considers several indicators, including unloading time, throughput, tonnage, process variability, operational losses, and a proxy of operator exposure. To strengthen the human-centric dimension, an Operational Handling Exposure Proxy (OHEP) was introduced to capture manoeuvre-related operator exposure during wagon handling and batch repositioning. A weighted scoring system was then used to identify the most balanced configuration by considering trade-offs between performance, stability, losses and operator exposure. The results show that the arrival-track operational configuration influences loss structure, process stability and overall decision ranking more than direct throughput alone. Track 2 provides the best overall trade-off under the baseline MCDM weighting scheme, while Track 3 may become preferable when wagon-loss minimization is prioritized. The findings highlight the importance of integrating variability and human-centered indicators into industrial decision-making processes. In future work, the proposed framework could be extended using data-driven methods and machine learning to support predictive and adaptive optimization in Industry 5.0 environments. This study contributes to the literature by integrating real-world industrial analysis, multi-criteria decision-making, and sustainability-oriented optimization into a single decision support framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayoub Raziq & Mohamed El Khaili & Abdellah Zamma & Hasna Nhaila, 2026. "Study of Sustainable Rail Wagon Unloading in a Real-Life Scenario Based on a Multi-Criteria Decision Framework Under Industry 5.0 Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6353-:d:1972516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/6353/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/6353/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6353-:d:1972516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.