IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i12p6351-d1972480.html

Sustainable Reduction in Administrative Costs in Social Protection Systems Through Digitalization and AI-Driven Process Automation

Author

Listed:
  • George Abuselidze

    (Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance, Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University, Ninoshvili, 35, Batumi 6010, Georgia
    School of Business and Administrative Studies, The University of Georgia, Kostava, 77a, Tbilisi 0171, Georgia)

  • Gulnara Amanova

    (Department of Accounting and Analysis, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Kazhymukan, 11, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan)

  • Aidana Ryskeldiyeva

    (Department of Accounting and Analysis, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Kazhymukan, 11, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan)

  • Kunsulu Saduakassova

    (Department of Accounting and Analysis, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Kazhymukan, 11, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Efficient and financially sustainable social protection systems are essential under conditions of economic instability and increasing social demand. However, traditional administrative models are often characterized by high operational costs, procedural complexity, and delayed benefit delivery. This study examines the role of digitalization, process automation, and AI-driven administrative solutions in reducing administrative expenses while enhancing the sustainability and resilience of social protection systems. An integrated Automation Index is developed using standardized proxy indicators that reflect reductions in operational and transaction costs associated with digital and automated technologies. To assess future trajectories of administrative expenses, scenario-based modelling is applied under three digital transformation paths—baseline, moderate, and intensive. Administrative efficiency is estimated using a translog Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) framework. The results indicate that digitalization and automation significantly reduce administrative costs only when supported by favorable institutional conditions, including decentralized governance, effective inter-agency coordination, and clearly regulated administrative procedures. Under the intensive digital transformation scenario, administrative expenses decline substantially relative to the baseline, while system responsiveness and beneficiary coverage improve. In contrast, weak institutional environments limit the efficiency gains of technological solutions. The study concludes that AI agents and automated systems should be viewed not as substitutes for human decision-making but as tools for optimizing administrative architectures. This transition from resource-intensive to technology-intensive models is particularly important for developing countries seeking sustainable social protection under constrained fiscal conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • George Abuselidze & Gulnara Amanova & Aidana Ryskeldiyeva & Kunsulu Saduakassova, 2026. "Sustainable Reduction in Administrative Costs in Social Protection Systems Through Digitalization and AI-Driven Process Automation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-30, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6351-:d:1972480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/6351/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/6351/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6351-:d:1972480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.