IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i12p6329-d1971753.html

The Role of Saltmarsh Restoration in Lowering Shoreline Vulnerability Within an Urban Estuary Environment: A Case Study from North of Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Jacinto Cunha

    (CIIMAR—Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos S/N, Matosinhos, 4450-208 Porto, Portugal)

  • Loreto Garcia

    (CIIMAR—Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos S/N, Matosinhos, 4450-208 Porto, Portugal)

  • Vânia Freitas

    (CIIMAR—Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos S/N, Matosinhos, 4450-208 Porto, Portugal)

  • Cristina Marisa R. Almeida

    (CIIMAR—Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos S/N, Matosinhos, 4450-208 Porto, Portugal
    Chemistry and Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal)

  • Sandra Ramos

    (CIIMAR—Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos S/N, Matosinhos, 4450-208 Porto, Portugal
    Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Sea-level rise is accelerating coastal erosion and storm-driven flooding, increasing risks to estuarine ecosystems and coastal communities. Nature-based solutions (NbS), such as those including ecosystem restoration, are widely endorsed for climate change risk mitigation, yet their protective performance under rising sea levels remains poorly quantified across future scenarios. Here we combined scenario-based modelling with spatially explicit exposure mapping to assess how saltmarshes influence shoreline vulnerability under three Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP) sea-level rise projections for 2050 and 2100. Using the InVEST Coastal Vulnerability Model and the Lima estuary (NW Portugal) as a case study, we showed that existing saltmarshes currently reduce mean shoreline exposure by approximately 5%, but this contribution declines with sea-level rise, falling to 2.6% by 2100 under SSP5-8.5, resulting in an increase in areas subject to High and Very High exposure risk. But under a saltmarsh revegetation scenario, model results indicated that this revegetation significantly increases the protection across all future scenarios, reducing the number of shoreline points in High and Very High exposure classes by up to 58% and lowering the potential coastal population exposure by up to 27% by 2100 under SSP5-8.5. However, the protective effect of saltmarshes diminished under the most extreme sea-level rise trajectories, indicating that saltmarsh revegetation alone may not be enough to fully offset accelerating coastal hazards. Our results demonstrate that saltmarsh restoration can deliver meaningful climate adaptation benefits; however, to safeguard estuarine systems and coastal communities under accelerating climate change in the long term, restoration actions must be integrated into broader adaptation strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacinto Cunha & Loreto Garcia & Vânia Freitas & Cristina Marisa R. Almeida & Sandra Ramos, 2026. "The Role of Saltmarsh Restoration in Lowering Shoreline Vulnerability Within an Urban Estuary Environment: A Case Study from North of Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6329-:d:1971753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/6329/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/6329/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6329-:d:1971753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.