Author
Listed:
- Yujie Chen
(School of Economics and Management, Yantai University, Yantai 264000, China)
- Xiaohan Wang
(School of Economics and Management, Yantai University, Yantai 264000, China)
- Feifei Wang
(School of Management, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China)
- Yong Li
(School of Economics and Management, Yantai University, Yantai 264000, China)
- Wenlong Xu
(School of Economics and Management, Yantai University, Yantai 264000, China)
Abstract
Against the coordinated advancement of building a maritime power, high-quality development of marine tourism and ecological civilization construction, realizing positive interaction between marine resource conservation and tourism industrial development has emerged as a pivotal issue for high-quality growth in coastal regions. Taking 11 coastal provincial-level administrative regions in China spanning 2008 to 2024 as the research sample, this paper first establishes an evaluation indicator system covering marine resources and the tourism industry. It further adopts an integrated empirical framework encompassing the coupling coordination degree model, spatial Markov chain model, obstacle degree model, fixed-effect model and geographically and temporally weighted regression ( GTWR ) model to systematically unpack the spatiotemporal differentiation characteristics, internal restrictive obstacle factors and external driving determinants of the two-system coupling coordination. On this basis, a marine resource compensation mechanism for tourist destinations is formulated. Empirical results demonstrate four core findings: (1) In terms of temporal evolution, the overall coupling coordination level keeps rising and goes through three phases: initial development, rapid improvement and post-shock recovery. After a short-term decline triggered by the pandemic, the index rebounds markedly after 2023, showing that the two systems can recover and stabilize. (2) In terms of spatial layout, a persistent stratified spatial pattern featuring “higher coordination in southern coast versus lower coordination in northern coast with three-tier hierarchical differentiation” is identified; high-level neighboring regions exert prominent positive spatial spillover effects, whereas low-level adjacent areas are prone to fall into development lock-in traps. (3) For internal constraint obstacles, the marine resource subsystem is persistently restricted by resource exploitation limits and coastal spatial scarcity, while the dominant bottleneck of the tourism industrial subsystem shifts from insufficient market scale to inadequate human capital supply. (4) Regarding external driving forces, the proportion of tertiary industry and the digital infrastructure constitute core driving contributors, whereas marketization progress and opening-up degree act as primary restrictive factors, with pronounced spatial heterogeneity existing across all driving indicators. Finally, in line with the quasi-public-good attribute and ecological externality of marine resources, this study constructs a differentiated and synergistic marine resource compensation mechanism from three dimensions: stakeholder identification, compensation implementation pathways and institutional guarantee systems. The proposed framework provides theoretical references and practical policy options to facilitate high-level coupling and coordinated development between marine resource preservation and the coastal tourism industry. The marginal contribution of this research lies in integrating coupling coordination measurement, obstacle factor diagnosis, driving mechanism identification and compensation mechanism design into an integrated analytical framework, which delivers theoretical foundations and operable policy solutions for coastal marine resource protection, tourism industrial upgrading and differentiated compensation system construction.
Suggested Citation
Yujie Chen & Xiaohan Wang & Feifei Wang & Yong Li & Wenlong Xu, 2026.
"Marine Resources and Tourism Industry in China’s Coastal Areas: Coupling Coordination, Driving Mechanism and Compensation Path,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-29, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6312-:d:1971029
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6312-:d:1971029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.